2021
DOI: 10.1002/9780891189817.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Health Assessment of Forest Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wood stake mass loss followed the order of the two Populus > pine, which was in line with previous research, for example, (Jurgensen et al., 2006; Page‐Dumroese, Jurgensen, et al., 2021; Page‐Dumroese, Sanchez, et al., 2021; Risch et al., 2022), that wood from deciduous species, in our case poplar and aspen stakes, have less lignin, lower lignin: N, and C:N as compared to coniferous species, making them more susceptible to decay fungi (Hu et al., 2018; Perez et al., 2021). Biochar, manure, or other soil additives can affect belowground C flux directly by promoting the utilization of microbial available C, for example, original or fresh SOM; (Cui et al., 2017; Ventura et al., 2019), or indirectly by changing soil physicochemical and biological (e.g., microbial biomass and composition) properties (Steinbeiss et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wood stake mass loss followed the order of the two Populus > pine, which was in line with previous research, for example, (Jurgensen et al., 2006; Page‐Dumroese, Jurgensen, et al., 2021; Page‐Dumroese, Sanchez, et al., 2021; Risch et al., 2022), that wood from deciduous species, in our case poplar and aspen stakes, have less lignin, lower lignin: N, and C:N as compared to coniferous species, making them more susceptible to decay fungi (Hu et al., 2018; Perez et al., 2021). Biochar, manure, or other soil additives can affect belowground C flux directly by promoting the utilization of microbial available C, for example, original or fresh SOM; (Cui et al., 2017; Ventura et al., 2019), or indirectly by changing soil physicochemical and biological (e.g., microbial biomass and composition) properties (Steinbeiss et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our first hypothesis was that biochar would promote wood decomposition (i.e., mass loss) more than manure because of its recalcitrance in the soil and its role in increasing soil moisture. Overall, in our study, mineral wood stakes had higher moisture content, mass loss, and C loss than surface stakes, which may be a function of the more favorable soil moisture and temperature conditions (Bradford et al, 2021;Page-Dumroese, Jurgensen, et al, 2021;Page-Dumroese, Sanchez, et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2019) compared with wood on the soil surface that is subject to greater daily fluctuations in temperature and moisture that limit fungal decay (Brooks & Kyker-Snowman, 2008;Wang et al, 2020;Zhong et al, 2017). Our results show that biochar and manure interacted to increase the moisture content of surface and mineral stakes, but biochar as an independent variable always had significant effects on wood stake moisture content, whereas manure only had a significant effect on pine stake moisture in the mineral soil (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, frequent harvesting operations or land‐use changes can cause C loss, resulting in nutrient imbalances, drought, and reduced ecosystem services that soils provide (e.g., food and fiber), especially in plantations (Coban et al, 2022; Mishra et al, 2022; Newbold et al, 2015). Increasing SOM has proven to be an effective measure in restoring fundamental physical, chemical, and biological soil properties (Krupek et al, 2022; Page‐Dumroese et al, 2021) and enhancing soil health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil is a dynamic system influenced by its physical, chemical, and biological properties [14]. Foresters usually evaluate a site's potential to support productive forests based on their understanding of the chemical and physical properties of the soil without considering the soil's biological properties [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No indicator of forest soil properties is sufficient to describe soil quality because changes in one characteristic will likely affect other properties. Combining chemical, physical, and biological properties is necessarily better for understanding the impact of forest management on soil quality [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%