1993
DOI: 10.1021/es00040a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil-gas entry into an experimental basement: model measurement comparisons and seasonal effects

Abstract: The article has not been subjected to CARB review and does not necessarily reflect their views. Additional funding from NIEHS Superfund Program under Grant 5 P42 ES04699-05 is gratefully acknowledged.Previous studies have reported a large and persistent discrepancy between field measurements and model predictions of pressure-driven entry of soil gas into housesthe phenomenon that causes high concentrations of radon indoors. The discrepancy is often attributed to poor understanding of inherently complex field s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because measurements of the building depressurization under ambient conditions were not made, the effective entry rate under ambient conditions (shown as a hatched region in Figure 7) is estimated from the one week average of indoor SF6 concentrations, assuming a range of depressurizations between 1 and 4 Pa. The dependence of the soil-gas entry rate on building depressurization is approximately linear (see thick solid line in Figure 7), in agreement with a model for advective soil-gas entry limited by the soil permeability to air rather (26), although the available data can not discriminate against small deviations from linearity.…”
Section: Estimated Effective Soil-gas Entry Into Buildingsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Because measurements of the building depressurization under ambient conditions were not made, the effective entry rate under ambient conditions (shown as a hatched region in Figure 7) is estimated from the one week average of indoor SF6 concentrations, assuming a range of depressurizations between 1 and 4 Pa. The dependence of the soil-gas entry rate on building depressurization is approximately linear (see thick solid line in Figure 7), in agreement with a model for advective soil-gas entry limited by the soil permeability to air rather (26), although the available data can not discriminate against small deviations from linearity.…”
Section: Estimated Effective Soil-gas Entry Into Buildingsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, the non-uniform soil permeability, in particular the generally higher permeability of the undisturbed soil relative the permeability of the backfill, is a possible explanation for the increased pressure coupling further from the structure walls. Garbesi et al (1992) discuss the pressure field data in more detail and show that the measured pressure field and the associated soil gas entry rates deviate substantially from quantitative predictions made with a numerical model.…”
Section: Experiments Experimental Approachesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Examples of the experimental data are presented and discussed. In a companion paper, Garbesi et al (1992) describe the results of the initial experimental investigation of steadystate soil gas transport driven by a steady pressure difference, compare the experimental results to predictions of a steady-state numerical model, and discuss possible explanations for the substantial discrepancy between measured data and predictions.…”
Section: Research Approach and Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several radon studies also suggest that radon intrusion by advection is typically a more significant process than is diffusion. [7][8][9][10] The most significant factors affecting the near-field compartment would therefore tend to be building underpressurization, the permeability of the building envelope and nearby soil, and depth to contamination.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Soil Vapor Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%