2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil fragmentation and aggregate stability as affected by conventional tillage implements and relations with fractal dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
2
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The seedbed preparation in conservation tillage systems, on undisturbed soil, is generally limited to the superficial layer: the machines generally operate on crop residues and are equipped with working tools such as straight shanks, to disrupt compacted subsurface layers, and with disks and/or rollers capable of cutting the residues, pulverizing, and leveling the upper layer of soil. These machines, even combined together in a single implement and not powered by the tractor PTO but with passive action on the soil, are capable to prepare, in a single step, a good quality seedbed, for the sowing of an autumnwinter cereal, with consequent energy savings, and to avoid soil compaction [57,58].…”
Section: Quality Of Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seedbed preparation in conservation tillage systems, on undisturbed soil, is generally limited to the superficial layer: the machines generally operate on crop residues and are equipped with working tools such as straight shanks, to disrupt compacted subsurface layers, and with disks and/or rollers capable of cutting the residues, pulverizing, and leveling the upper layer of soil. These machines, even combined together in a single implement and not powered by the tractor PTO but with passive action on the soil, are capable to prepare, in a single step, a good quality seedbed, for the sowing of an autumnwinter cereal, with consequent energy savings, and to avoid soil compaction [57,58].…”
Section: Quality Of Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on each aggregate size fraction was expressed as a percent relative to the total dry weight of the sample. Mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), and mass fractal dimension (D m ) were calculated as Cagna [20] and Tagar [21] to evaluate soil aggregate stability.…”
Section: Soil Aggregates Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust emissions are also indirectly influenced by anthropogenic activities and changes in soil structure, and hence the erodibility of the soils (e.g. [8,9]). Gaseous emissions from soil may also lead to particulate formation (see the next section).…”
Section: How Soils Affect Air Quality (A) Direct Source Of Pollutants or Precursors To Pollutants (I) Particulatesmentioning
confidence: 99%