1984
DOI: 10.1080/02571862.1984.10634107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil factors affecting tree growth and root development in a citrus orchard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In citrus Patt et al (1966), based on a survey encompassing many different soil types, found that root density declined where the soil air filled porosity (AFP) at field capacity was between 5 to 10%. Nel and Bennie (1984) measured citrus root development in three soil types and concluded that when the soil AFP at field capacity was less than 15% there was little root development. Vines appear to be more tolerant as we found at least 25% of the roots in soil with an AFP at field capacity of less than or equal to 6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In citrus Patt et al (1966), based on a survey encompassing many different soil types, found that root density declined where the soil air filled porosity (AFP) at field capacity was between 5 to 10%. Nel and Bennie (1984) measured citrus root development in three soil types and concluded that when the soil AFP at field capacity was less than 15% there was little root development. Vines appear to be more tolerant as we found at least 25% of the roots in soil with an AFP at field capacity of less than or equal to 6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of ridging on the physical properties of vineyard soils was intensively investigated by Myburgh & Moolrnan (l991a;1991b), Myburgh (1994) and, of sugar cane soils, by Van Antwerpen & George (1991). An investigation into soil factors affecting growth and root development of citrus trees by Nel & Bennie (1984) revealed that poor irrigation scheduling, leaving most of the root zone with less than 15% air-filled porosity, was the major reason for poor performance.…”
Section: Soil Aerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, it is generally accepted a decline in growth as an usual plant response to saturated soils. Restricted tree and root growth was observed when air capacity was reduced to level less than 15% (Nel and Bennie, 1984). Soil saturation up to close to flooding negativelly affecting growth-related parameters in tree species has also been reported (Sakio, 2005;Oliveira and Joly, 2010;Allen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%