2017
DOI: 10.12681/bgsg.11731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Erosion Estimation Using the Epm Model

Abstract: The study aims to evaluate soil erosion and investigate its spatial distribution by applying the empirical EPM (i.e. Erosion Potential Model)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Xa is the coefficient of soil protection and is non-dimensional parameter in relation with the vegetation cover and catchment's land use and it varies from 0.05 to 1. The values of this parameter are obtained by adaptation of the land use map of the Sarada river basin to the Erosion Potential Method guidelines and according to existing values in previous studies [38][39][40][41]. Thus, values of the coefficient Xa have been attributed to each unit of land use (Table 2).…”
Section: Erosion Process Intensity Prevailing Erosion Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where Xa is the coefficient of soil protection and is non-dimensional parameter in relation with the vegetation cover and catchment's land use and it varies from 0.05 to 1. The values of this parameter are obtained by adaptation of the land use map of the Sarada river basin to the Erosion Potential Method guidelines and according to existing values in previous studies [38][39][40][41]. Thus, values of the coefficient Xa have been attributed to each unit of land use (Table 2).…”
Section: Erosion Process Intensity Prevailing Erosion Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It depends on the pedological and lithological characteristics of the watershed and indicates the resistance of soils to erosion. The values of this non-dimensional factor can be determined either by laboratory experimentation or by field measurements [36,41] and usually ranges from 0.25 to 2. In this study, we used the soil map data and the geological map of the study area to evaluate the Y factor.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Type and Extent Of Erosion φ Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the formations met were limestones, hornstones, ophiolites, flysch, clay schists, conglomerates, sandstones, marls and quaternary alluvial deposits (terraces, talus cones and scree etc.) (Efthimiou and Lykoudi 2016).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%