2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil erosion and water retention varies with plantation type and age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Both local and introduced arboreal species can be used for afforestation (Li et al, 2012). To maximize the benefits of afforestation efforts, it is necessary to take into account the particularities of the tree species used as well as of the plantation age (Sun et al, 2018;. Tree species can influence biological, chemical, and physical properties of soils directly through their deep roots, as well as through litter quality and quantity (Day et al, 2010;Edmondson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both local and introduced arboreal species can be used for afforestation (Li et al, 2012). To maximize the benefits of afforestation efforts, it is necessary to take into account the particularities of the tree species used as well as of the plantation age (Sun et al, 2018;. Tree species can influence biological, chemical, and physical properties of soils directly through their deep roots, as well as through litter quality and quantity (Day et al, 2010;Edmondson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that the wind-water coupled erosion zone is the center of extremely severe erosion in the Loess Plateau which is influenced by both wind and water forces (Tsunekawa et al, 2014). The climate is characterized as the great intensity of rainfall and heavy rainfall in this region, so that greater runoff will occur as pointed by Sun et al (2018). As a result, high soil conservation value can be gained under the GFGP.…”
Section: Identification Of the Location Of Target Areas For Gfgpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O plantio de eucalipto apresentou maior capacidade de retenção de umidade no solo em razão das práticas de manejo adotadas e da ocasião da coleta das amostras (5 anos após o plantio), no qual a cobertura do solo pela serapilheira facilita a infiltração e percolação de água. Sun et al (2018) observaram maior capacidade de retenção de umidade do solo sob o plantio de E. urophylla comparado com outras culturas, no período de 2008-2013, verificando maior consumo de água pela planta no período inicial, ocorrendo uma gradual redução em estágios mais maduros, reduzindo também a perda de sedimentos por escoamento superficial. Almeida et al (2009) observaram maior consumo de água de água em povoamento de E. grandis aos três anos de idade, propiciando redução no teor de água no solo.…”
Section: Figura 3: Precipitação Acumulada (Mm) Eunclassified
“…A quantidade de água retida no solo após a precipitação é variável com a cobertura existente (VENKATESH et al, 2011;WANG et al, 2013;GASHAW et al, 2018), desenvolvimento da vegetação (HUANG et al, 2016;SUN et al, 2018), exposição solar (GEROY et al, 2011), práticas de manejo adotadas (CARVALHO et al, 2009;JUNIOR et al, 2014;GUADAGNIN et al, 2018) e tipo de solo (BEUTLER et al, 2002;O'GEEN, 2012). Wang et al (2013) verificaram alterações na dinâmica na umidade do solo sob diferentes coberturas vegetais, onde, com subarbustos apresentando maior retenção da umidade e menor para a plantio de milho.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified