2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil disturbance by native animals along grazing gradients in an arid grassland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others (Landsberg et al 2002;Angassa et al 2010;Angassa 2014) have shown that increased grazing intensity and trampling effect in the vicinity of water source point can affect soil stability and vegetation condition, often leading to substantial reductions in ecosystem services and functions. A similar conclusion was reached by previous studies (Shahriary et al 2012;Eldridge and Whitford 2009), suggesting that more soil disturbance can occur due to the effects of trampling and year-round grazing in the vicinity of water source point.…”
Section: Effects Of Grazing Intensity On Range Conditionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Others (Landsberg et al 2002;Angassa et al 2010;Angassa 2014) have shown that increased grazing intensity and trampling effect in the vicinity of water source point can affect soil stability and vegetation condition, often leading to substantial reductions in ecosystem services and functions. A similar conclusion was reached by previous studies (Shahriary et al 2012;Eldridge and Whitford 2009), suggesting that more soil disturbance can occur due to the effects of trampling and year-round grazing in the vicinity of water source point.…”
Section: Effects Of Grazing Intensity On Range Conditionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In terrestrial communities of the Boreal Forest and the Arctic, rodents are important components at the base of food webs, and provide significant energy flow via predation to higher trophic level animals, including raptors and mammalian carnivorans (Robinson et al 2014). They are also responsible for numerous ecological services and disturbances including seed dispersal (Lichti et al 2014), symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungi (Maser et al 1978;Luoma et al 2003;Frank et al 2009), soil development and fertilization (McKendrick et al 1980;Hallett et al 2003;Eldridge andWhitford 2009), andherbivory (Luoma et al 2003;Gough et al 2007;Olofsson et al 2012). Stomach content analyses of northern rodents have shown a spectrum of dietary sources that include some combination of grasses, seeds, berries, buds, lichen, moss, fungi, and in some cases arthropods (Lensink 1983;Bangs 1984;Batzli and Henttonen 1990;Bergman and Krebs 1993;Luoma et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase may be related to the increased abundance of Petrosimonia sibirica (Table 1), an annual halophyte (Zhao, Song, Feng, Zhao, & Liu, 2011), previous researches in this region found that the growth of halophytes can lead to the accumulation of alkaline ions in surface soil, and increase the soil pH (Xu et al., 2016; Zhang, Xiong, An, & Xia, 2012). The SOM mainly comes from livestock feces and litter decomposition (Eldridge & Whitford, 2009; Fernandez‐Gimenez & Allen‐Diaz, 2001), and functions as a regulator of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in desert ecosystems. Although it is common that exclosure can increase litter accumulation (Vecchio, Bolaños, Golluscio, & Rodríguez, 2019), without trampling by livestock (Naeth, Bailey, Pluth, Chanasyk, & Hardin, 1991), and together with stopping fecal inputs in the 6‐year exclosure, the content of SOM reduced compare with grazing land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%