2002
DOI: 10.13031/2013.8527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Detachment by Shallow Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
314
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
18
314
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation and development of an EG channel Compared with the runoff velocities without upslope inflow, runoff velocities with upslope inflow applied were much larger; mean runoff velocities with inflow were 22.7% to 79.4% larger than those without inflow. Zhang et al, (2002) and Zhang et al, (2009) found that runoff velocity was better correlated with the detachment rate than other hydraulic parameters and was linearly related to the measured sediment transport capacity; that is corroborated by our findings (Table 2).…”
Section: Runoff Velocities In Ephemeral Gully Channelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The formation and development of an EG channel Compared with the runoff velocities without upslope inflow, runoff velocities with upslope inflow applied were much larger; mean runoff velocities with inflow were 22.7% to 79.4% larger than those without inflow. Zhang et al, (2002) and Zhang et al, (2009) found that runoff velocity was better correlated with the detachment rate than other hydraulic parameters and was linearly related to the measured sediment transport capacity; that is corroborated by our findings (Table 2).…”
Section: Runoff Velocities In Ephemeral Gully Channelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, a power equation was recommended to relate the soil detachment capacity to the unit stream power based on the results of linear and nonlinear regression analyses (Figure 6c). The stream power was a better indicator to estimate the soil detachment capacity than the shear stress and unit stream power for yellow soil, and similar findings have been reported in other soil regions (Nearing et al, 1997(Nearing et al, , 1999Wang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2002Zhang et al, , 2003. In contrast, if the shear stress was adopted, R 2 was very low for the field conditions.…”
Section: Unit Stream Powersupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this study, the detachment capacity was positively correlated to the flow velocity at the 0.01 level and that the correlation coefficient between the detachment capacity and the mean velocity was greater than those with either the flow rate or the slope gradient. This fact could also hold for loess (Zhang et al, 2003;Zhang, Liu, Tang & Zhang, 2008), Haplustalf (Zhang et al, 2002) and red soil (Wang et al, 2017), indicating that the velocity was a powerful parameter for predicting soil detachment capacity. With the increasing velocity, the detachment capacity was described well by a power function ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Velocitymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations