2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00394.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil conservation and technical efficiency among hillside farmers in Central America: a switching regression model*

Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to evaluate and analyse technical efficiency (TE) levels for hillside farmers under different levels of adoption of soil conservation in El Salvador and Honduras. A switching regression model is implemented to examine potential selectivity bias for high and low level adopters, and separate stochastic production frontiers, corrected for selectivity bias, are estimated for each group. The main results indicate that households with above-average adoption show statistically high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
43
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach was implemented by Solís et al . () when analysing farmers with different levels of adoption of soil conservation in Central America. However, this procedure has proven unsuitable for nonlinear models such as the SPF (Greene, ).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach was implemented by Solís et al . () when analysing farmers with different levels of adoption of soil conservation in Central America. However, this procedure has proven unsuitable for nonlinear models such as the SPF (Greene, ).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these standard predictors are either of a socio‐economic nature, or they focus on bio‐physical farm characteristics. Examples of studies include Ervin and Ervin (1982), Norris and Batie (1987), Pagoulatos et al (1989), Gould et al (1989), Ramírez and Shultz (2000), Lichtenberg (2001), Asrat et al (2004), Cramb (2005), Anley et al (2007) or Solís et al (2007). The above studies assess adoption of SCM mostly by external assessment or by self‐reported actual adoption ('revealed preferences').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we cannot simply attribute these differences to participation in supermarket channels, because of a potential selection bias: some of the factors determining participation in supermarket channels may also influence farm efficiency and productivity. A common approach to address selectivity issues is the two-step Heckman (1976) procedure, which was recently used by Sipiläinen and Lansink (2005) and Solis, Bravo-Ureta, and Quiroga (2007). However, the two-step Heckman procedure is less suitable for non-linear functions such as the stochastic frontier.…”
Section: Potential Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%