2019
DOI: 10.1002/geot.201900021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling – An overview of laboratory tests

Abstract: The application of full‐face mechanized tunnelling, mainly with EPB shielded machines, has widely increased in the last years and today it can be considered the key technology when tunnelling in soils above and below the water table. The applicability range of EPB machines has widened thanks on one side to the technological and mechanical progresses and on the other side to the quality and effectiveness of the conditioning products. No recognized standards are available for laboratory testing of conditioned so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four foaming agent products (P1, P2, P3 and P4, equally suitable from a geotechnical point of view for this tunnel excavation) to be used for the two lithologies were suggested by the geotechnical laboratory feasibility studies with slump cone tests. These tests evaluated the workability and consistency of the two soils with the various foaming agents, providing the correct foaming agent treatment ratio (TR) to be applied for each soil [19][20][21]33]. The tests were conducted at Turin Polytechnic (Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering Dept., Tunnelling and Underground Space Lab), using a foam generation system that reproduces the conditioning characteristics used by an EPB-TBM [19,34].…”
Section: Soils and Foaming Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four foaming agent products (P1, P2, P3 and P4, equally suitable from a geotechnical point of view for this tunnel excavation) to be used for the two lithologies were suggested by the geotechnical laboratory feasibility studies with slump cone tests. These tests evaluated the workability and consistency of the two soils with the various foaming agents, providing the correct foaming agent treatment ratio (TR) to be applied for each soil [19][20][21]33]. The tests were conducted at Turin Polytechnic (Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering Dept., Tunnelling and Underground Space Lab), using a foam generation system that reproduces the conditioning characteristics used by an EPB-TBM [19,34].…”
Section: Soils and Foaming Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests evaluated the workability and consistency of the two soils with the various foaming agents, providing the correct foaming agent treatment ratio (TR) to be applied for each soil [19][20][21]33]. The tests were conducted at Turin Polytechnic (Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering Dept., Tunnelling and Underground Space Lab), using a foam generation system that reproduces the conditioning characteristics used by an EPB-TBM [19,34]. Table 1 reports the density of each foaming agent and the highest amount used (soil Treatment Ratio, TR, L/m 3 ) [19], together with the percentage of SLES.…”
Section: Soils and Foaming Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The workability is widely studied by slump tests to ensure the effect of soil conditioning (Peila et al, 2013;Peila et al, 2016;Peila et al, 2019). Yet in cohesive soil, slump test is not feasible as the soil is usually in a plastic state (Oliveira, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2019), the consistency index I c is used instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%