Soil CO₂–C Emissions and Correlations with Soil Properties in Degraded and Managed Pastures in Southern Brazil

Abstract

Land degradation has been a global environmental issue, and its cause includes poorly managed grazing. Quantitative information is needed to support policy actions for food and water security and development. The objective of this study was to assess and characterize CO2–C emissions in degraded (DP) and managed pasture (MP) areas located close to one another, describing their spatial–temporal variability and any correlation with possible controlling factors. A grid of 100 × 100 m with 102 sample points in each area was set up. Measurements of CO2–C emission (FCO2), soil temperature (Tsoil), soil water content (WCsoil), soil physical (i.e. soil texture, soil bulk density, macro‐porosity, micro‐porosity, air‐filled pore space and total pore volume) and chemical (i.e. pH, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium and cation exchange capacity) analysis were conducted at each sample point. Total emissions calculated from the area below the FCO2 graphs were 640.7 and 440.0 kg CO2–C ha−1 in the DP and MP, respectively. Soil temperature in the MP was lower (t‐test, p < 0.01) throughout the experimental period when compared with the DP. This study found that the degraded pasture area released significantly more CO2–C compared with the well‐managed pasture. Therefore, the introduction of best management practices in pasture areas is an important strategy to reduce soil CO2–C losses and promote soil C accumulation. The MP presented lower FCO2 despite its higher soil C stock, indicating a more stable soil C condition when compared with the DP area. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Greenhouse gas emissions in conversion from extensive pasture to other agricultural systems in the Andean region of Colombia

“…Hence, a lower CH 4 emission from enteric fermentation per head would be achieved in IP rather than in PRP, due to a better feed digestibility found in improved pasture conditions, as listed in Table 4. This assertion is supported by several studies (Primavesi et al 2004, Figueiredo et al 2017b, which showed that the efficiency of grass utilization, Table 4 GHG emissions related to conventional agriculture (PRP), improved pasture (IP) and silvopastoral system (SPS) in the Andean region of Colombia, according to each emission source (kg CO 2 eq ha -1 yr -1 ) considered herein GHG emissions related to the stocking rates in each agricultural system, 0.5 AU ha -1 yr -1 in PRP, 1.5 AU ha -1 individual animal performance and production per hectare is largely determined by improved management practices. When comparing SPS and IP emission sources, it could be observed that the reduction of the total emissions results from the different sources.…”

Divergent responses of ecosystem respiration components to livestock exclusion on the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau

“…GE can influence ER both directly and indirectly (Figueiredo et al, ; Gao et al, ; Jerome et al, ; Zhou et al, ). First, the GE‐induced accumulation of both aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) can lead to higher plant growth respiration and plant maintenance respiration (Koncz et al, ; Wang, Wu, Liu, Yang, & Hao, ), and this is likely to cause higher ER in GE plots than in grazed plots.…”

Assessing Local Uncertainty of Soil Protection in an Olive Grove Area with Pruning Residues Cover: A Geostatistical Cosimulation Approach

“…To model this random function, we first described the spatial dependence for Dp o , V and Np by using the variogram function. Variography provides a description of the spatial pattern of a variable, as explained in detail by Barretto de Figueiredo et al (2016) and Costa et al (2015). Next, we used geostatistical simulation, which provides a realistic way to evaluate the spatial variability of a variable, as detailed by Reis et al (2005).…”