Soil chemical properties after 12 years of tillage and crop rotation

Mikha, Maysoon M.; Hergert, Gary W.; Qiao, Xin; Maharjan, Bijesh

doi:10.1002/agj2.20281

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 49 publications

(91 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar observations in SOC, TN and BD were also reported in previous studies [4]; however, there were different variation rules for soil nutrients [30]. The different changes in soil characteristics caused by the tillage management influence may be related to environmental conditions, soil conditions and the time of the experiment [31,32].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Meanwhile, RT had significantly higher SWC than that under PT and ST, which was mainly due to the tillage operation resulting in the different distribution of soil aggregates and soil texture [40]. Previous studies showed that different tillage management methods caused soil properties to vary greatly [32]. In the present study, the AK, AP and TP varied greatly with the deepening of the soil layer under different tillage management, while the TK had no significant difference in the four depths.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 45%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sensitivities of Physical and Chemical Attributes of Soil Quality to Different Tillage Management

Zhao

Zhu

et al. 2022

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tillage management is a direct factor in affecting soil quality, which is a key factor in sustainable agriculture. However soil quality evaluation needs significant manpower, material resources and time. To explore the sensitive indicators of soil quality affected by tillage management, eight soil physical and chemical properties under three tillage managements, including plow tillage, subsoiling tillage and rotary tillage, were determined under a long-term experiment in North China Plain. The results showed that subsoiling tillage management had the highest soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the 0–20 cm layer and the lowest soil bulk density in the 30–40 cm layer. Rotary tillage management had the highest soil water content in the 0–40 cm layer. Meanwhile, compared to 2002, the soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and soil bulk density had varied greatly in 2012, but there was no significant difference between 2012 and 2018. However, other property concentrations tended to increase in 2002, 2012 and 2018. In addition, there was a significant linear relationship between soil quality index and grain yield. Subsoiling tillage management had the highest soil quality index and gain yield both in 2012 and 2018. The soil quality can be evaluated through the sensitive indicator of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, soil bulk density, total phosphorus and soil water content, which provides a scientific basis for selecting reasonable tillage management and evaluating soil quality in this agricultural production area or other similar areas.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 45%

Sensitivities of Physical and Chemical Attributes of Soil Quality to Different Tillage Management

Zhao

Zhu

et al. 2022

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Others (Godsey et al, 2007;Sainju & Alasinrin, 2020) reported that crop rotation increased soil pH and Al concentration compared with monocropping. In contrast, Mikha et al (2020) found that crop rotation had no effect on soil chemical properties.…”

mentioning

confidence: 84%

“…Crop rotation has a favorable effect on crop yields compared with monocropping. Crop yields were greater with crop rotation than monocropping (Lin & Chen, 2014; Lopez‐Bedillo et al., 2000; Mikha et al., 2020). Some researchers (Carr et al., 2006; Lenssen et al., 2007; Stevenson & van Kessel, 1996) reported that spring wheat–pea rotation increased spring wheat yield by 13–30% compared with continuous spring wheat in dryland cropping systems in the northern Great Plains.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of no‐till crop rotation on dryland soil properties and crop yields

Sainju

2022

Agronomy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information on the effect of no-till crop rotation on a broad range of soil properties and long-term crop yields is needed to evaluate its benefits on ecosystem services compared with monocropping. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of no-till crop rotation (barley [Hordeum vulgare L.]/spring wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]-pea [Pisum sativum L.]) and monocropping [continuous barley/spring wheat] on 66 dryland soil physical, chemical, biological, and biochemical properties and longterm crop yields at two dryland farm sites (14-and 36-yr old) in the northern Great Plains. Soil samples collected to a depth of 15 cm in April 2019 were analyzed for soil properties and crop yields determined. At the long-term site, crop rotation increased 11 properties, but reduced 16 of 66 soil properties compared with monocropping.At the short-time site, crop rotation increased 6 properties, but reduced 13 of 66 soil properties compared with monocropping. Longer duration experiments showed more differences in soil properties due to crop rotation than shorter duration experiments. Spring wheat and barley yields were greater following pea than following spring wheat or barley during years with normal or above-average precipitation at both sites. Pea yield in the crop rotation was also greater during these years. Barley/spring wheat-pea rotation can enhance some soil properties and dryland crop yields compared with continuous barley/spring wheat during wet years in the semiarid region of the northern Great Plains. INTRODUCTIONA 2-yr barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)/spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-summer fallow rotation has been used to conserve soil water, control weeds, reduce N fertilization rates, and decrease the risk of crop failure for the last several Abbreviations: ACEP, autoclaved citrate-extractable protein; CW1, continuous spring wheat; CW2, continuous barley (2006-2011) replaced by continuous spring wheat (2012-2019); NAG, N-acetyl β-glucosaminidase; PLFA, phospholipid-derived fatty acid; WP1, spring wheat-barley (1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996) replaced by spring wheat-pea rotation WP2, barley-pea (2006 WP2, barley-pea ( -2011 replaced by spring wheat-pea rotation (2012-2019).

show abstract