2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, and water pollution under different tillage practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that high initial SOC stocks were the major factors driving carbon loss under cropland expansion in drylands (Figure 4a), which has also been found in studies on plantations, transformed grassland, and fallow fields (Meyer et al, 2017; van Straaten et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2021). SOC stocks lose resulting from harvest and residue removal reduced carbon input into SOC pool (Drewniak et al, 2015), and cultivation accelerated decomposition of SOC when the natural ecosystem converted to cropland (Bhattacharyya et al, 2022). SOC stocks keep decreasing until achieving a net balance between the carbon input and output (soil respiration, Rs), and Rs rate is related to SOC stocks (Lei et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that high initial SOC stocks were the major factors driving carbon loss under cropland expansion in drylands (Figure 4a), which has also been found in studies on plantations, transformed grassland, and fallow fields (Meyer et al, 2017; van Straaten et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2021). SOC stocks lose resulting from harvest and residue removal reduced carbon input into SOC pool (Drewniak et al, 2015), and cultivation accelerated decomposition of SOC when the natural ecosystem converted to cropland (Bhattacharyya et al, 2022). SOC stocks keep decreasing until achieving a net balance between the carbon input and output (soil respiration, Rs), and Rs rate is related to SOC stocks (Lei et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While wildlife conservation is central to conservation designs in this region, it is important to note that biome‐wide frameworks, opposed to surrogate‐models, may receive wider adoption and support by appealing to more diverse stakeholder groups. Biodiversity is a key, yet singular property in the NSS threatened by stressors including tillage agriculture, invasive annual grasses, and woodland expansion, which similarly threaten other ecosystem services including forage production for domestic livestock (Morford et al, 2022), carbon stocks (Bradley et al, 2006), and water quality (Bhattacharyya et al, 2022). Shifting the narrative from species to large and intact rangelands provides a path for more parity and inclusion among conservation frameworks, ultimately increasing the likelihood of success, while ensuring their connectivity is critical to conserving the migratory movements necessary to sustain wildlife in this landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the SCS potential of no-tillage is high compared to other tillage practices [18] . Several meta-analyses indicated that the no-tillage practice can increase SOC stock about 8% [94] or over 0.4 Mg• ha −1 • yr −1 C [16,109] compared with that under the standard tillage practice.…”
Section: Practices On Croplandmentioning
confidence: 99%