The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9780203739273-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Carbon Distribution in Nonacidic and Acidic Tundra of Arctic Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bockheim et al () reported values of (50 kg C/m 3 ) for the area around Barrow in northwestern Alaska coast. As they noted, this is less than other inland Arctic sites (62 kg C/m 3 reported in Michaelson et al, , and 65 kg C/m 3 in Bockheim et al, ), which might be due to higher ground ice contents in the coastal regions. Our results emphasize how important it is to include deeper carbon in calculations since only 44% of the SOC in our study was stored in the upper 1 m, with 56% of it at greater depths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bockheim et al () reported values of (50 kg C/m 3 ) for the area around Barrow in northwestern Alaska coast. As they noted, this is less than other inland Arctic sites (62 kg C/m 3 reported in Michaelson et al, , and 65 kg C/m 3 in Bockheim et al, ), which might be due to higher ground ice contents in the coastal regions. Our results emphasize how important it is to include deeper carbon in calculations since only 44% of the SOC in our study was stored in the upper 1 m, with 56% of it at greater depths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Where gravimetric ice contents were not available (35% of samples), another method was used based on several studies that showed a significant relationship ( R 2 = 0.823) between organic carbon concentrations and bulk densities (Bockheim et al, , ). In those cases, bulk density was estimated according to the following empirically derived equation (Bockheim et al, ): ρb=1.3740.5em()100.026x where x is the TOC (% wt).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation