1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00122-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil C and N changes on conservation reserve program lands in the Central Great Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
93
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant increase in C:N ratio in re-established grasslands is associated with an effect of land conversion and illustrates the large capability of soil C storage as compared to N [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Significant increase in C:N ratio in re-established grasslands is associated with an effect of land conversion and illustrates the large capability of soil C storage as compared to N [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The different trends of STC at 30-60 and 60-90 cm with N rates suggest that N fertilization rate had a variable effect on STC at various depths after 2-4 yr of perennial grass establishment. Several researchers [4,20,32] did not find significant effect of N fertilization on SOC at 0-30 cm under perennial grasses after 2-5 yr. Only after 4-12 yr, N fertilization increased SOC at 0-90 cm by 0.5-2.4 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 compared with no N fertilization under switchgrass in USA and Canada [33][34][35]. It is likely that longer than 4 yr of the present study is needed to observe the effect of N fertilization on root C input and STC under perennial grasses.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nitrogen fertilization can variably influence SOC and STN under perennial grasses. Several researchers [20,32] found that N fertilization did not influence SOC at 0-30 cm under switchgrass after 2-3 yr or under perennial grasses after 5 yr in Alabama and Colorado. In contrast, Rice et al [33] reported that N fertilization to cool-season grasses increased C sequestration rate at 0-30 cm by 1.6 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 compared with no N fertilization after 5 yr in Kansas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The agricultural practices on fallowlands have large impacts on soil organic carbon and CO 2 emissions, economic subsidies, and potential environmental impacts, such as erosion, ground water contamination, and trace greenhouse gas productions. [23][24][25] Mapping of fallowlands and capturing its temporal dynamics throughout the growing season can contribute to an improved understanding of the potential for different management practices to mitigate the negative effects of drought-related cropland fallowing. For example, shortage of water for irrigation and crop production is one of the major impacts of drought in the heavily cultivated Central Valley in California, and therefore timely and accurate information on fallowland acreage is extremely useful in identifying the extent of changes in fallowed acreage due to water shortage during drought and guiding decision making with respect to requests for local water transfers, county drought designations, or state emergency proclamations.…”
Section: Rationale For This Research: Advances Over Existing State Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%