2007
DOI: 10.1897/06-420r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for sub‐Antarctic islands contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons

Abstract: Sub-Antarctic islands have been subjected to petroleum hydrocarbon spills, yet no information is available regarding the toxicity of petroleum hydrocarbons to these subpolar soils. The purpose of the present study was to identify soil biogeochemical toxicity end points for petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in sub-Antarctic soil. Soil from Macquarie Island, a sub-Antarctic island south of Australia, was collected and exposed to 10 concentrations of Special Antarctic Blend (SAB) diesel fuel, ranging from 0 to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rayner et al [15] used a hydrocarbon distribution model to determine that nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) droplets start to form in Macquarie Island soils at hydrocarbon concentrations between 50 to 1,000 mg/kg, depending on soil type and carbon content. Soil biogeochemical endpoints, including nitrification, denitrification, carbohydrate utilization, and total soil respiration, were developed for Macquarie Island soils by Schafer et al [36] to examine SAB contamination. The potential nitrification activity was the most sensitive endpoint to the native microbial community, with an IC20 value of 190 mg SAB/kg soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rayner et al [15] used a hydrocarbon distribution model to determine that nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) droplets start to form in Macquarie Island soils at hydrocarbon concentrations between 50 to 1,000 mg/kg, depending on soil type and carbon content. Soil biogeochemical endpoints, including nitrification, denitrification, carbohydrate utilization, and total soil respiration, were developed for Macquarie Island soils by Schafer et al [36] to examine SAB contamination. The potential nitrification activity was the most sensitive endpoint to the native microbial community, with an IC20 value of 190 mg SAB/kg soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the added organic matter reduced the toxicity of SAB-contaminated soils in germination tests, but increased toxicity in terms of above ground shoot growth. This may be related to nutrient cycling within contaminated soils, as microbial-driven nitrification was inhibited within SAB-contaminated fuels in subantarctic regions (IC 20 at 660 mg SAB/kg soil over 21 days [14]), most likely due to the enzymatic inhibition of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), however, denitrification process were very tolerant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative environmental impacts and high costs associated with excavating and transporting contaminated soils for off-site processing and treatment have led the Australian Antarctic Division (AAD) to abandon dig-and-haul methods in favour of implementing alternative onsite in situ remediation techniques [2,3]. The in situ techniques utilised on subantarctic Macquarie Island include injection of nutrients and aeration into the soils, both of which promote natural attenuation by encouraging hydrocarbon-degrading microbes [3,[10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An extensive history of polar exploration and exploitation, together with present research activities, has left subantarctic islands, such as Macquarie Island, with a legacy of petroleum pollution as a result of accidental fuel spills (Aislabie et al, 2001;Schafer et al, 2007;Tin et al, 2008). Australia's research station on Macquarie Island is heavily reliant on a light range diesel fuel known as Special Antarctic Blend (SAB), which is comprised mainly of petroleum hydrocarbons in the range C9-18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%