2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil biogeochemical responses of a tropical forest to warming and hurricane disturbance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach required all leaf-level measurements to be pooled at the plot level, thus dramatically reducing our statistical power compared to the regression-style analyses, which included plant-level data. We found no differences in temperature, soil moisture, or available nutrients between treatments that could easily explain pre-warming physiological variation between heated and control plots (Kimball et al, 2018;Reed et al, 2020). In January 2016, prior to initiation of the warming treatment, there were no differences in foliar nitrogen per unit leaf area for either P. brachiata (Student's t test, p = 0.122) nor P. glabrescens (p = 0.520).…”
Section: Assessing Physiological Responses By Treatment Versus Actualmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach required all leaf-level measurements to be pooled at the plot level, thus dramatically reducing our statistical power compared to the regression-style analyses, which included plant-level data. We found no differences in temperature, soil moisture, or available nutrients between treatments that could easily explain pre-warming physiological variation between heated and control plots (Kimball et al, 2018;Reed et al, 2020). In January 2016, prior to initiation of the warming treatment, there were no differences in foliar nitrogen per unit leaf area for either P. brachiata (Student's t test, p = 0.122) nor P. glabrescens (p = 0.520).…”
Section: Assessing Physiological Responses By Treatment Versus Actualmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…See Kimball et al (2018) for more detail of experimental design and infrastructure. Plots experienced less than 20% canopy openness (Reed et al, 2020). In August 2017, canopy cover was similar between treatments, where leaf area index was 6.60 ± 0.27 (mean ± sd) in control and 6.34 ± 0.22 in heated plots.…”
Section: Study Site and Meteorological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, although we expected that the decrease in root phosphatase activity could have been triggered by an increase in soil available P, we in fact measured a decrease in soil available P in our sites (Table 1). Reed et al (2020) also reported an initial decrease in soil available P (first 3 months after Hurricane María), but soon after, they measured a sharp increase. Differences in methods assessing soil available P can account for important differences in P-values (Neyroud and Lischer, 2003), which represents a challenge and limitation in tropical forest ecology.…”
Section: Stability Of Root Trait Expression Before Vs After the Hurricanesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Differences in methods assessing soil available P can account for important differences in P-values (Neyroud and Lischer, 2003), which represents a challenge and limitation in tropical forest ecology. Nevertheless, other potential factors influencing changes in root phosphatase activity could have been related to changes in soil moisture (SB2 was flooded for several months), a decrease of plant demand for P because of extensive defoliation, or changes in competition from understory vegetation abundance (Kennard et al, 2020;Reed et al, 2020). We cannot separate these different possible influences but note that the responsiveness of root phosphatase to environmental change may be an important consideration in evaluating phosphorus nutrition of tropical forests.…”
Section: Stability Of Root Trait Expression Before Vs After the Hurricanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first tropical forest warming experiment, TRACE uses infrared (IR) heaters under free‐air, open‐field conditions, to warm understory vegetation to 4°C ± 0.1°C and surface soils to 3.3 ± 0.3°C above that of ambient control plots (Kimball et al., 2018). After one year of warming, the study area was strongly affected by the passing of Hurricanes Irma and María, resulting in almost complete defoliation of the forest canopy, broken branches, and downed trees (Reed et al., 2020). This open canopy significantly alters understory microclimate, creating a high light environment with more variable temperature and humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%