2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11188356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Bacteria as Potential Biological Control Agents of Fusarium Species Associated with Asparagus Decline Syndrome

Abstract: To avoid the use of agrochemicals in agriculture, alternative methods are emerging to control plant pathogens. Some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be used as biocontrol agents since they can induce protection against pathogens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of several PGPR strains against the main Fusarium species involved in asparagus decline syndrome (ADS): F. proliferatum, F. oxysporum f. sp. asparagi and F. redolens. In vitro antagonism assays showed that all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also known that at least 4–5% genome of any strain of the B. subtilis is responsible for the production of antimicrobial compounds ( Stein, 2005 ). This species has also been identified as a good candidate for plant growth promotion and/or biocontrol of many plant diseases by different researchers ( Pandey, 2018a ; Caulier et al, 2019 ; De la Lastra et al, 2021 ). These organisms enhance plant growth and suppress plant diseases by different modes of action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that at least 4–5% genome of any strain of the B. subtilis is responsible for the production of antimicrobial compounds ( Stein, 2005 ). This species has also been identified as a good candidate for plant growth promotion and/or biocontrol of many plant diseases by different researchers ( Pandey, 2018a ; Caulier et al, 2019 ; De la Lastra et al, 2021 ). These organisms enhance plant growth and suppress plant diseases by different modes of action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strains exhibited a proved antagonism against M . phaseolina 53,54 and were previously identified as Bacillus paralicheniformis Hvs2, Streptomyces fradiae Hvs6, Brevibacterium frigoritolerans Hvs8, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AC17, Bacillus velezensis ACH16, Bacillus velezensis FC37 53,58 . The second set of bacterial strains was isolated from healthy “disease escape” almond trees cv.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strains exhibited a proved antagonism against M. phaseolina 53,54 and were previously identified as Bacillus paralicheniformis Hvs2, Streptomyces fradiae Hvs6, Brevibacterium frigoritolerans Hvs8, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AC17, Bacillus velezensis ACH16, Bacillus velezensis FC37. 53,58 The second set of bacterial strains was isolated from healthy "disease escape" almond trees cv. Belona and Soleta grown in a commercial orchard with more than 90% of Botryosphaeria canker disease incidence (Alcalá del Río, Seville): Pantoea agglomerans Bel 1-1, Kocuria rhizophila Bel 1-3, Rhizobium soli Bel 1-4, Kocuria rhizophila Bel 1-5, Bacillus safensis subsp.…”
Section: Antagonistic Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, disease control by chemical pesticides is cost-effective for farmers in developing countries ( Wesseling et al, 1997 ; Bordoh et al, 2020 ). For these reasons, biological control using antagonistic microorganisms has emerged as environment-friendly alternative to control plant diseases ( Köhl et al, 2019 ; De la Lastra et al, 2021 ). Antagonistic microorganisms produce a variety of secondary metabolites to combat plant pathogens ( Hossain et al, 2015 ; Köhl et al, 2019 ; Cellini et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%