2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration respond differently to land-use change and variations in environmental factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO 2 from soil comes from the autotrophic respiration of plant roots and the decomposition of soil organic carbon by microbes (heterotrophic respiration). All the processes are regulated by soil organic carbon availability, root activity, microbes, soil and air temperature, and soil moisture content (Atarashi-Andoh et al 2012;Wu 2020;Hu et al 2018). Higher soil temperature and moisture content increase microbial activity (Qu et al 2020) and thus higher CO 2 emission rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 from soil comes from the autotrophic respiration of plant roots and the decomposition of soil organic carbon by microbes (heterotrophic respiration). All the processes are regulated by soil organic carbon availability, root activity, microbes, soil and air temperature, and soil moisture content (Atarashi-Andoh et al 2012;Wu 2020;Hu et al 2018). Higher soil temperature and moisture content increase microbial activity (Qu et al 2020) and thus higher CO 2 emission rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-use conversion can significantly affect the soil physicochemical and biological properties (Yang et al, 2004;Don et al, 2011;Moghimian et al, 2017). Over the past few decades, in order to gain higher economic benefits and to supply the growing demands of timber, paper and fuel, among other commodities, the conversion from natural forests to plantations is becoming more frequent (Burton et al, 2007;Li et al, 2014;Hu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All comparisons occurred under both alternate wetting and drying: WET/DRY and continuous flooding: FLOOD. All regression lines are significant at p < 0.01. with CH 4 emissions could indicate higher C loss (Lu et al 2000;Hu et al 2018;Wu et al 2018). Moreover, given the decreased Fe 2+ in the soil solution under P fertilization, Fe 3+ could have occluded part of the applied P under any available oxic conditions in the soil, preventing immediate plant uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%