2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Application of a Formulated Biocontrol Rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1606, Induces Soil Suppressiveness by Impacting Specific Microbial Communities

Abstract: Biocontrol Rhizobacterium Impact on Microbial Communities avocado soils infested with R. necatrix resulted in biological control of the pathogen. This suppressiveness phenotype was analyzed, and PcPCL1606 has a key role in suppressiveness induction; in addition, this phenotype was strongly dependent on the production of HPR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To unravel the behaviour of the Pc strains on the root scenario, the distribution pattern of fluorescent-tagged strains over the root surface viewed by confocal microscopy revealed a similar distribution pattern for the three strains when inoculated individually, colonizing the junctions of the epidemic cells of the roots, similar to that previously shown for the 06 strain ( Calderón et al., 2014 ). However, when competing with other strains, PCL1607 did not efficiently compete when PCL1601 was present, displaying a cell distribution in dispersed microcolonies along the root surface and alteration of its previously described individual colonization pattern which was stable over time, approaching levels of approximately 10 6 cfu/g root, which have been considered the carrying capacity for bacteria of the avocado root ( Tienda et al., 2020 ). These results revealed that, individually, these strains can easily adapt to the root environment without competition with another microorganism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To unravel the behaviour of the Pc strains on the root scenario, the distribution pattern of fluorescent-tagged strains over the root surface viewed by confocal microscopy revealed a similar distribution pattern for the three strains when inoculated individually, colonizing the junctions of the epidemic cells of the roots, similar to that previously shown for the 06 strain ( Calderón et al., 2014 ). However, when competing with other strains, PCL1607 did not efficiently compete when PCL1601 was present, displaying a cell distribution in dispersed microcolonies along the root surface and alteration of its previously described individual colonization pattern which was stable over time, approaching levels of approximately 10 6 cfu/g root, which have been considered the carrying capacity for bacteria of the avocado root ( Tienda et al., 2020 ). These results revealed that, individually, these strains can easily adapt to the root environment without competition with another microorganism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Routinely, the three wild-type Pseudomonas chlororaphis strains PCL1601, PCL1606 and PCL1607, and the derivative Pseudomonas spp. obtained were grown in lysogenic broth (LB) medium ( Bertani, 1951 ), tryptone peptone glycerol (TPG) medium ( Calderón et al., 2014 ), and M9 minimal medium supplemented with 10 mM succinate as a carbon source ( Miller, 1972 ; Tienda et al., 2020 ). Escherichia coli was grown on LB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2019) demonstrated that Bacillus thuringiensis C25 exhibited strong antagonistic effects on mycelial growth by degrading the cell wall structures of R. necatrix mycelia. Recently, Tienda et al (2020) used a microbiome study to achieve an improved understanding of natural interactions between biocontrol agents and their impact on microbial communities. They observed that Pseudomonas chlororaphis (PCL1606) exhibited the highest biocontrol efficacy, and the biocontrol activity was directly correlated with the antifungal antibiotic 2-hexyl 5-propyl resorcinol, and the modified microbial communities.…”
Section: Antagonistic Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or Bacillus spp. [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]; mycoviruses (Reovirus, Megabirnavirus and Hypovirus) [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]; and integrated management with the use of antagonistic fungi plus antagonistic bacteria [ 29 ], antagonistic rhizobacteria, Trichoderma spp. or non-pathogenic R. necatrix plus fungicide [ 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%