2013
DOI: 10.13031/swce.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Seventh Edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DULQ was 53%, 48%, and 78% for the MN 2014, ND 2014, and ND 2015 (table 3). For a surface irrigation system, 70% DULQ is considered an acceptable value (Huffman et al, 2011). Our measurements showed the DULQ was below the acceptable range when the SI duration was short.…”
Section: Distribution Uniformity Low Quartermentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DULQ was 53%, 48%, and 78% for the MN 2014, ND 2014, and ND 2015 (table 3). For a surface irrigation system, 70% DULQ is considered an acceptable value (Huffman et al, 2011). Our measurements showed the DULQ was below the acceptable range when the SI duration was short.…”
Section: Distribution Uniformity Low Quartermentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The SI system UC was close to the acceptable range (water was applied from below the surface). A sprinkler system is considered acceptable with a UC of 80% (Huffman et al, 2011). There was no observed difference in crop growth due to lower uniformity coefficient.…”
Section: Uniformity Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essa distribuição foi ajustada às séries históricas de intensidades máximas de chuvas com 30, 360, 720 e 1.440 min de duração para estimativa dos valores associados aos tempos de retorno de 5, 50 e 100 anos. As combinações desses tempos de retorno e tempos de duração estão associadas às chuvas intensas mais frequentemente aplicadas ao dimensionamento de obras hidráulicas para controle da erosão e do escoamento superficial em estradas, áreas urbanas e rurais (Huffman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…where S is the maximum potential difference between rainfall and runoff at the moment of rainfall initiation and CN is a proportion of rainfall converted to runoff, adjusted for antecedent rainfall conditions. CN values were derived for Puerto Rico using the method described by [51], based on land use, hydrologic soil group, and antecedent rainfall conditions. To estimate DP, the following procedure is followed: SMD2 i = Precip -ET a -RO + SMD1.…”
Section: Satellite Information Classification and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%