2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil and species effects on bark nutrient storage in a premontane tropical forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns have been observed for leaf, wood, and bark P concentrations in tree species (Heineman et al, 2016;Jones et al, 2019). Wood P concentrations vary enormously at Fortuna (19-300 µg g −1 ), and P is the wood nutrient most sensitive to soil nutrient availability (Heineman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Phosphorus Effects On Plant Performancesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similar patterns have been observed for leaf, wood, and bark P concentrations in tree species (Heineman et al, 2016;Jones et al, 2019). Wood P concentrations vary enormously at Fortuna (19-300 µg g −1 ), and P is the wood nutrient most sensitive to soil nutrient availability (Heineman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Phosphorus Effects On Plant Performancesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, xylem quality will also promote its own decomposition and the termite contribution to it and, to test this part, it is important to also understand the covariation between bark traits and xylem traits across tree species (Jones et al. 2019), and thereby inferring covariation between bark and xylem decomposability (cf. Chang et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to the complex interactions that govern wood decomposition, including those between substrate characteristics, decomposer communities and environmental conditions (Cornelissen et al, 2012; Cornwell et al, 2009; Weedon et al, 2009). An additional complicating factor is the presence of bark, an important and underexplored component of woody biomass, which comprises a significant portion of forest biomass (2%–20% above‐ground tree biomass; Jones, Heineman, & Dalling, 2019) and a large fraction of nutrients in above‐ground biomass (26%–33% for nitrogen [N] and 19%–22% for phosphorus in a tropical forest; Jones, Heineman, et al, 2019). Furthermore, studying how wood and bark differ in decomposition rate and in their decomposer communities across aquatic and terrestrial habitats could help improve our understanding of decomposition processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because bark and wood differ in the characteristics that influence decomposition, separating bark and wood decomposition is an easy and potentially revealing way to reduce unexplained variation in wood decomposition and to understand the effect of substrate composition on microbial communities. Bark generally has two to tenfold higher N and phosphorus concentrations than wood (Antikainen, Haapanen, & Rekolainen, 2004; Harmon et al, 1986; Jones, Heineman, et al, 2019) and differs from wood in density (Fearnside, 1991), moisture (Ulyshen et al, 2016), and lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose concentration (Cornwell et al, 2009). Bark can also contain more defensive compounds than wood, potentially slowing the colonization of dead wood by decomposers (Cornwell et al, 2009; Ganjegunte, Condron, Clinton, Davis, & Mahieu, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%