“…The software provides an evaluation, on a scale of 1-5, where five represents a very high soil aptitude to perform the environmental function, four refers a high aptitude, three is an intermediate aptitude, two represents a low aptitude, and one is a very low aptitude [16]. The soil function scenarios that can be modeled are: (1) human habitats, in which sites suitable for human settlements are identified; (2) decomposition of organic compounds, which allows the capacity of microorganisms to maintain the cycling of nutrients to be evaluated; (3) the natural archive, which allows the history of soils to be evaluated through pedological or geological features in the subsoil; (4) the cultural archive, which considers elements related to ancient populations such as artifacts; (5) naturalness of the soil, which evaluates the importance of the soil as a reservoir of diversity of animals and plants; (6) aquifer recharge, which evaluates the importance of soils for the water purification and recharge of aquifers; (7) retention of nutrients, which analyses soil fertility in order to plan soil management practices; (8) agricultural quality, which evaluates the capacity of soils for food production; (9) soil organic carbon content, which estimates the soil organic carbon content by horizon and profile; and (10) absorption and adsorption of heavy metals, which evaluates the capacity of soils to adsorb contaminants such as heavy metals [16,17].…”