1997
DOI: 10.2737/fpl-gtr-102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softwoods of North America

Abstract: This book is dedicated to Elbert Luther Little, Jr. (1907-present) for his significant and voluminous contributions to the nomenclature and geographic distributions of both softwood and hardwood trees of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The MOE result for Douglas fir does not achieve the values stated by Alden [30] at any of the sites. The value from the forest land only comes close to the data for the Douglas fir from the area of the Interior South: 10,300 MPa.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The MOE result for Douglas fir does not achieve the values stated by Alden [30] at any of the sites. The value from the forest land only comes close to the data for the Douglas fir from the area of the Interior South: 10,300 MPa.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The evaluated Douglas fir wood does not achieve any of the values from the areas of the original expansion stated by Alden [30], regardless of site. Likewise, the spruce and pine exhibited lower values compared to the literature [32]: 78 MPa and 80 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The natural habitat of Grand fi r is the Northwest coast of North America. The climatic conditions in its natural habitat range from mild maritime to downright continental climate (Foiles et al, 1991;Alden, 1997;Klinka, 2007). Grand fi r is considered in the Central European region to be a prospective introduced tree species.…”
Section: Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Při opracování a lepení nevznikají vzhledem k chybějícím pryskyřičným kanálkům větší problémy (Vos & Kharazipour 2010). Hustota dřeva v rámci přirozeného areálu v Severní Americe dosahuje kolem 370 kg.m −3 (Alden 1997;Green et al 1999), zatímco v ČR je v průměru o něco vyšší, a to 405 kg.m −3 (Lukášek et al 2012). Objemová hmotnost je v důsledku rychlého růstu projevujícího se malým podílem pozdního dřeva a velkým (0,54 cm) tloušťkovým přírůstem nízká (Hofman 1963).…”
Section: Charakter a Využití Dřevaunclassified