2021
DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2019.2954088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Vulnerability Discovery via Learning Multi-Domain Knowledge Bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As summarized in Table 3 Competitive methods. For this case study, we compare Poem against two state-of-the-art deep-learning-based vulnerability detection models: uVuldeepecker [66] and Lin et al [40]. Results of this case study is presented in Section 4.4.…”
Section: Case Study 4: Vulnerability Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in Table 3 Competitive methods. For this case study, we compare Poem against two state-of-the-art deep-learning-based vulnerability detection models: uVuldeepecker [66] and Lin et al [40]. Results of this case study is presented in Section 4.4.…”
Section: Case Study 4: Vulnerability Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A machine-learned model can then be applied to new software projects to identify potentially vulnerable code that exhibits similar patterns as those vulnerable samples seen in the training data. There is now ample evidence showing that machine learning techniques can exceed expert-crafted rules [3] for detecting common code vulnerabilities or bugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have leveraged deep learning (DL) to reason about program structures to identify potential software vulnerabilities at the source code [4,5,6,3,7]. Compared to classical machine learning techniques, DL has the advantage of not requiring expert involvement to tune representations for program structures manually; instead, it automatically captures and determines them from training samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations