2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0097-8493(02)00287-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software tools using CSRBFs for processing scattered data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm has been further improved by Kojekine et al [17] by organizing the sparse matrix into a band-diagonal sparse matrix which can be solved more efficiently by using iterative methods. Unfortunately, the radius of support has to be chosen globally, which means that the method is not robust against highly non-uniformly distributed point sets where the density of the samples may vary significantly.…”
Section: Scattered Data Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm has been further improved by Kojekine et al [17] by organizing the sparse matrix into a band-diagonal sparse matrix which can be solved more efficiently by using iterative methods. Unfortunately, the radius of support has to be chosen globally, which means that the method is not robust against highly non-uniformly distributed point sets where the density of the samples may vary significantly.…”
Section: Scattered Data Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the solution of the system in Eq. (4) is the most time-consuming operation (21) , we propose a system to store the result of step 2. By this way it is not necessary to calculate spline coefficients again for every resolution conversion.…”
Section: 1 Image Resolution Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) is also proportional to N. The latter becomes significant when N is large and s(x) is evaluated on a fine grid. Fast sorting algorithm (21) is used for image reconstruction at step 4.…”
Section: 2 Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group is fast methods for fitting and evaluating RBFs (45) . The third is compactly supported RBFs (47), (48) . Let us notice here about recent outstanding work of Ohtake et al (49) where compactly supported radial basis functions (CSRBS) are used as blending functions.…”
Section: Surface Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our software implementation, we employ a standard approach for creating a binary tree from an initial point data set with an additional required parametric value K, which denotes the maximum number of points in a leaf. Such a tree allows to provide an efficient sorting of scattered data (48) that leads to obtaining a band diagonal sub-matrix A; after that Cholesky decomposing and block Gaussian solution are applied.…”
Section: Surface Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%