2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software tools for high-throughput CALPHAD from first-principles data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[51] The focus in the present work, though, was to compare the accuracy of sub-lattice models based on "simple and cheap" 0 K DFT-based calculations against qualitative and quantitative experimental trends. It is not surprising that more accurate predictions can be obtained via theoretical models with higher degrees of complexity and costs of computation, [72] but such accurate methods are not practical for materials screening. Nevertheless, we have included an estimate of the errors that can arise in O predictions with and without including the T…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[51] The focus in the present work, though, was to compare the accuracy of sub-lattice models based on "simple and cheap" 0 K DFT-based calculations against qualitative and quantitative experimental trends. It is not surprising that more accurate predictions can be obtained via theoretical models with higher degrees of complexity and costs of computation, [72] but such accurate methods are not practical for materials screening. Nevertheless, we have included an estimate of the errors that can arise in O predictions with and without including the T…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior examples of sub-lattice models obtained solely from DFT-based data do exist. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78] However, such models have been used primarily for intermetallics and not ionic materials (such as Ce-O and Zr-Ce-O) that usually involve several noncharge-neutral "end-members" (Section 3.1) whose energies are not trivial to obtain theoretically. Note that there is an ongoing effort by the developers of FactSage software [79] in building sublattice models by combining the 0 K DFT data from the Materials Project database [80] with high-throughput computing [81] and/or machine learning to obtain vibrational entropy as a function of temperature (middle panel in Figure 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For completeness, we include the TDB file resulting from our fitting process, although we would not recommend that it be used as is to construct a CAL-PHAD assessment, due to the approximate treatment of the SRO in the fcc and hcp phases. We have attempted to include the fcc and hcp phases as single-sublattice models (with SRO effects properly included via a CVM-based method, [13] ) however the resulting free energies are nearly degenerate with the multi-sublattice descriptions used here and manually correcting the multiple spurious crossing of the corresponding free energies or integrating the singleand multiple-lattice descriptions into a single CEF model would lead to a method that is not really amenable to a high-throughput treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we use the sqs2tdb tools of the Alloy Theoretic Automated Toolkit (ATAT) [13,14] to generate all structural input files and to construct the Calphad model from the ab initio calculations output. For structures not included in ATAT's pre-generated database of SQS, the ''mcsqs'' code [15] is used to generate suitable SQS with controlled compositions on each sublattice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of the art calculation of phase diagrams (Calphad) method [70,71,72,73] allows for the calculation of phase equilibria in multicomponent systems above room temperature at atmospheric pressure, providing that Gibbs free energy functions for all phases from room temperature to the melting point and above can be derived from observed phase equilibria and thermodynamic data. In Calphad assessments, ab initio computational results are treated on the same footing as experimental data.…”
Section: Phase Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%