2019
DOI: 10.1108/mbe-11-2018-0098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software-supported collaboration in small- and medium-sized enterprises

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to understand the current state and challenges of deploying collaborative applications in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Germany. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 101 SMEs in Germany showed how intensively collaborative applications are used today and the positive and negative effects associated with their use. Analyses proved correlations between the use of collaborative applications, the need for cooperation within SMEs and the effects and benefits of their use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High consensus of the raters, and the selection of items with a high rating (>3.8) supports the scale’s content validity [ 81 ], the uniform factor structure its construct validity [ 82 ]. The selective impact of satisfaction, professional role, and prior experience on knowledge sharing reported later in this study supports the criterion validity of the scale [ 83 ], which was selected from a comprehensive research instrument on various aspects of knowledge sharing [ 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High consensus of the raters, and the selection of items with a high rating (>3.8) supports the scale’s content validity [ 81 ], the uniform factor structure its construct validity [ 82 ]. The selective impact of satisfaction, professional role, and prior experience on knowledge sharing reported later in this study supports the criterion validity of the scale [ 83 ], which was selected from a comprehensive research instrument on various aspects of knowledge sharing [ 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Measuring knowledge sharing. Following Hardwig [77,78], we distinguished between knowledge types, knowledge sources and knowledge instruments. Based on Erpenbeck [79], the transfer of implicit and explicit knowledge was examined at the individual level (from one person to another person) and at organizational level (e.g.…”
Section: Additional Item "Workload"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another human aspect that could be a potential barrier for SMEs is the presence of a rigid and inflexible mindset (Medini et al 2019 ; Thun et al 2019 ; Zangiacomi et al 2018 ). For example, Hardwig et al ( 2019 ) found that employees who have been through digital transformation noted that work is not only more condensed, but also requires more self-organization. As digital technologies enable working from any interface, people are more often asked to be available at any time.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring Knowledge Sharing. Following Hardwig [64,65], we distinguished between knowledge types, knowledge sources and knowledge instruments. Based on Erpenbeck [66], the transfer of implicit and explicit knowledge was examined at the individual level (from one person to another person) and at organizational level (e.g.…”
Section: Job Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%