International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2003. ICSM 2003. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/icsm.2003.1235411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software renewal projects estimation using dynamic calibration

Abstract: Effort estimation is a long faced problem, but, in spite of the amount of research spent in this field, it still remains an open issue in the software engineering community. This is true especially in the case of renewal of legacy systems, where the current and well established approaches also fail. This paper presents an application of the method named Dynamic Calibration for effort estimation of renewal projects together with its experimental validation. The approach satisfies all the requirements of the est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A second retrospective analysis reported in [4] was carried out on another bank (Italian Bank Y). It investigated a method, Dynamic Calibration (DC), for effort estimation of renewal projects.…”
Section: Retrospective Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second retrospective analysis reported in [4] was carried out on another bank (Italian Bank Y). It investigated a method, Dynamic Calibration (DC), for effort estimation of renewal projects.…”
Section: Retrospective Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind DC (approach presented in [13]) is to adopt and use an estimation model until it works well. When it becomes less accurate due to a process performance change, a new model must be obtained.…”
Section: Spc Inside Dynamic Calibration (Dc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, due to the extreme variety in software development, a model derived statistically from a context cannot be useful in others without any calibration to local environment. Although some adjustment techniques (see [7][8][9] ) were added to avoid that situation, they are too complex and difficult for practitioners (as well as customers) to understand and manipulate. In addition, like decomposition techniques, the need of detailed data (e.g., size) in empirical models also prevents the users from flexibly estimating.…”
Section: Background To Software Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%