2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-0491-6_95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Reliability Growth Model (SRGM) with Imperfect Debugging, Fault Reduction Factor and Multiple Change-Point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several SRGMs with multiple CPs have been proposed [21][22][23]. In general, these models estimate the CPs only by using failure data.…”
Section: Web Software Reliability Model With Multiple Cpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, several SRGMs with multiple CPs have been proposed [21][22][23]. In general, these models estimate the CPs only by using failure data.…”
Section: Web Software Reliability Model With Multiple Cpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao [20] suggested that, before the software is delivered to users, a CP may occur when the testing strategy and resource allocation change. Some reliability CP models have been published in the past, such as the Weibull CP model, the Jelinski Moranda de-eutrophication model with one CP, the Littlewood model with one CP [20], and the reliability model with multiple CPs [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these definitions, Musa's version of FRF became very popular in the research community. After Realizing the importance of FRF in affecting the failure behavior, several NHPP based SRGMs were proposed considering FRF as one of the key component [6,8,9,18,19,48]. These studies also captured the FRF trend.…”
Section: Frfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2002) discussed lifetime estimation problems when date-specific sales amounts are not available for products whose lifetime is measured in usage time. Jain et al (2012) predicted reliability growth and warranty cost of software with fault reduction factor, imperfect debugging, and multiple change point. Akbarov and Wu (2012) used the weighted maximum likelihood estimation for estimating model parameters which might, therefore, lead to better performance of warranty forecasting models than maximum likelihood estimation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%