Software Quality Practices in Growing Startups

Pizzini, Adriano; Vieira, Ricardo Bortolo; Gomes, Rhodrigo Deda; Santos, Gleison; Malucelli, Andreia; Reinehr, Sheila

doi:10.1145/3493244.3493254

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The quality of the software supporting online business has long been recognised as such [1]. Significant advancements have been made in measuring software quality, albeit the methods and tools do not formally integrate business parameters such as goals and objectives [2] [3]. The need for comprehensive frameworks in software quality assurance research is driven by the increasing complexity of software systems and the growing demand for software products that fulfil business objectives [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Insights into B2C E-Commerce Quality Using ISO 25010

Stefani,

Vamvatsikou,

Vassiliadis

2023

JSEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper introduces an innovative Software Quality Assurance framework tailored for B2C e-commerce systems, seamlessly integrating software quality with business objectives. Drawing from elements of the ISO 25000 series and ISO 20000 standards, this framework specifically addresses challenges inherent to e-commerce. By establishing business-relevant KPIs, the framework ensures that ongoing improvement initiatives resonate with the company's strategic goals. Additionally, the paper presents a Dynamic Bayesian Network model as a hands-on tool for implementing the framework within e-commerce organisations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Insights into B2C E-Commerce Quality Using ISO 25010

Stefani,

Vamvatsikou,

Vassiliadis

2023

JSEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The need for particular solutions arises in this application development scenario in different environments, technologies and contexts, together with different paradigms. Examples of situations are application development for games (Patel and Cassou, 2015), machine learning (Giray, 2021), blockchain (Yilmaz et al, 2019), Internet of Things (IoT) (Motta et al, 2023), startups (Pizzini et al, 2021) and selfadaptive systems (Andersson et al, 2013). However, each domain has activities specific to its development process, often requiring a different process than traditional software development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling software processes from different domains using SPEM and BPMN notations: An experience report of teaching software processes

Bezerra,

Coutinho

2023

JSERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a current application development scenario in different environments, technologies and contexts, such as IoT, Blockchain, Machine Learning and Cloud Computing, there is a need for particular solutions for domain-specific software development processes. The proper definition of software processes requires the understanding for the involved teams and organization’s particularities and specialized technical knowledge in Software Engineering. Although it is an essential part of Software Engineering, many university curricula do not dedicate as much effort to teaching software processes, focusing more on the basic principles of Software Engineering, such as requirements, architecture and programming languages. Another important aspect of software processes is modeling. The modeling of a software process provides a basis for managing, automating and supporting the software process improvement. In this context, teaching software process modeling becomes challenging, mainly due to the great emphasis on theory and few practices. This work presents an experience report teaching the definition and modeling of software processes in different domains. In the discipline of software processes, we applied a practice for defining and modeling processes in various application domains, such as: IoT, cloud, mobile, critical systems, self-adaptive systems, machine learning, blockchain and games. The processes were modeled in the Software Systems Process Engineering Metamodel (SPEM) and Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) notations based on references from the literature for each domain. We evaluated the process modeling practice with the SPEM and BPMN in two classes of the software processes discipline, and we had discussions about the use of the two notations applied to the different domains. In general, students reported good experiences in defining processes, highlighting the importance of practical modeling applications for professional life. As the main results of the study in teaching process modeling, we have that: (i) students accepted HEFLO tool better than EPF Composer tool; (ii) most students are not aware of specific domains and that anticipating the study of these domains in the discipline is a good strategy; and, (iii) the students also highlighted the need for more support for the two notation tools.

show abstract

Bridging the Gap: Addressing Software Testing Challenges in Namibian Startups through a Tailored Training Approach

Aludhilu,

Sutinen

2024

Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software Quality Practices in Growing Startups

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Insights into B2C E-Commerce Quality Using ISO 25010

Insights into B2C E-Commerce Quality Using ISO 25010

Modeling software processes from different domains using SPEM and BPMN notations: An experience report of teaching software processes

Bridging the Gap: Addressing Software Testing Challenges in Namibian Startups through a Tailored Training Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About