Software process modeling languages: A systematic literature review

García-Borgoñón, Laura; Barcelona, Miguel A.; García-García, J. A.; Alba, María D.; Cuaresma, María José Escalona

doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.10.001

Cited by 61 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, we are guided to use Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method which is commonly used for various examinations in the area of software engineering by Kitchenham and Charters [17]. This approach is a way of evaluating and reading completely existing research already carried out which are important in order to answer a particular research question in a specific topic [18]. Systematic reviews are intended to produce an unbiased assessment of a research topic by using a dependable, rigorous, and auditable procedure.…”

Section: Research Approaches and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability and Security in User Interface Design: A Systematic Literature Review

Nwokedi¹,

Onyimbo²,

Rad³

2016

IJITCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Systems carry sensitive data where users are involved. There is need for security concern for the modern software applications. We can term them as 'untrusted clients'. Internet usage has rapidly grown over the years and, more users are opening their information system to their clientele, it is essential to understand users' data that need protecting and to control system access as well and the rights of users of the system. Because of today's increasingly nomadic lifestyle, where they allow users to connect to information systems from anywhere with all the devices in the market, the users need to carry part of the information system out of the secure infrastructure. Insecurity in user interfaces is caused by user ignoring functionalities in the system where some are not only a threat but can harm the system e.g. leaving network services active even though the user does not need them, or when a user is having little or no information of the available security measures. This research paper aims critically address through a review of existing literature, the importance of balance or trade-off between usability and the security of the system. Systematic review method involved a physical exploration of some conference proceedings and journals to conduct the literature review. Research questions relating to usability and security were asked and the criteria for usability and security evaluations were identified. This systematic literature review is valuable in closing the gap between usability and security in software development process, where usability and security engineering needs to be considered for a better quality end-user software.

show abstract

Section: Research Approaches and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability and Security in User Interface Design: A Systematic Literature Review

Nwokedi¹,

Onyimbo²,

Rad³

2016

IJITCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Secondly, (García-Borgoñón et al, 2014) (Flores & Sepúlveda, 2011) propose patterns to express time rules included in a Gantt chart. They work with BPMN 1.2 supported artifacts.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discovering Business Models for Software Process Management - An Approach for Integrating Time and Resource Perspectives from Legacy Information Systems

Arévalo

Ramos

Escalona

2015

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Business Process Management (BPM) is becoming the modern core to support business in all type of organizations and software business is not an exception. Software companies are often involved in important and complex collaborative projects carried out by many stakeholders. Each actor (customers, suppliers or government instances, among others) works with individual and shared processes. Everyone needs dynamic and evolving approaches for managing their software projects lifecycle. Nevertheless, many companies still use systems that are out of the scope of BPM for planning and control projects and managing enterprise content (Enterprise Content Management, ECM) as well as all kinds of resources (ERP). Somehow systems include scattered artifacts that are related to BPM perspectives: control and data flow, time, resource and case, for example. It is aimed to get interoperable BPM models from these classical Legacy Information Systems (LIS). Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) allows going from application code to higher-level of abstraction models. Particularly, there are standards and proposals for reverse engineering LIS. This paper illustrates LIS cases for software project planning and ECM, looking at time and resource perspectives. To conclude, we will propose a MDE-based approach for taking out business models in the context of software process management.

show abstract

“…The current scenario of competitiveness has led software companies to seek solutions beyond software reuse in order to reduce time-to-market and increase return on investment (ROI). Thus, software development projects need to be tailored according to the needs of a company and its development domain (Garcia-Borgonon et al, 2014). Therefore, the Software Process Line (SPrL) technique (Rombach, 2005) is an alternative for process customization based on similar and variable process elements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Currently, there are several tools and languages for software process modeling (Garcia-Borgonon et al, 2014), as well as approaches that guide such modeling, as for instance, compositional, annotative, transformational and model-driven (Kästner, 2010;. Each approach is used in specific ways to represent variability among process elements .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Multilingualism in Data Warehouse Development

Dediź

Stanier

2016

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ICEIS 2016 received 257 paper submissions from 42 countries in all continents, which makes it one of the largest conferences in the World in the area of Information Systems, thus demonstrating the success and global dimension of this conference. From these, 42 papers were selected for publication and presentation at the Conference as full papers. These numbers, leading to a full-paper acceptance ratio of 16%, show the intention of preserving a high quality forum for this conference, a quality that we intend to maintain in the future, for the next editions of this conference.The high number and high quality of the received papers imposed difficult choices in the selection process. To evaluate each submission, a double blind paper review was performed by the Program Committee, whose members are highly qualified researchers in ICEIS topic areas.All presented papers will be available at the SCITEPRESS Digital Library and will be submitted for indexation by Thomson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index (ISI), INSPEC, DBLP, EI (Elsevier Index) and Scopus.Additionally, a short list of presented papers will be selected to be expanded into a forthcoming book of ICEIS 2016 Selected Papers to be published by Springer in the LNBIP Series.The technical program of the conference included a panel and 4 invited talks delivered by internationally distinguished speakers, namely: Claudia Loebbecke (University of Cologne, Germany), Sergio Gusmeroli (TXT e-solutions SPA, Italy), Wil Van Der Aalst (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands) and Jan Vom Brocke (University of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein). Their participation positively contributes to reinforce the overall quality of the Conference and to provide a deeper understanding of the fields addressed by the conference.Moreover, ICEIS 2016 had a Doctoral Consortium on Enterprise Information Systems and 1 tutorial. We are thankful to the Conference Co-chairs (Olivier Camp and José Cordeiro) and Program Co-chairs (Slimane Hammoudi, Leszek Maciaszek and Michele M. Missikoff) for their dedication and hard work in organizing these events.We sincerely thank all the authors for their submissions and participation in ICEIS 2016. Furthermore, we would like to thank all the members of the program committee and reviewers, who helped us with their expertise, dedication and time. We would also like to thank the invited speakers for their excellent contribution in sharing their knowledge and vision and the workshop/special session chairs whose collaboration with ICEIS 2015 was much appreciated. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the professional support of the ICEIS 2016 team for all organizational processes. XIIIWe hope that all colleagues find this a fruitful and inspiring conference. We hope to contribute to the development of the Enterprise Information Systems community and look forward to having additional research results presented at the next edition of ICEIS, details of which are available at http://www.iceis.org. Slimane Hammoudi University of Cologne, GermanyAbstract:...

show abstract

Software process modeling languages: A systematic literature review

Cited by 61 publications

References 45 publications

Usability and Security in User Interface Design: A Systematic Literature Review

Usability and Security in User Interface Design: A Systematic Literature Review

Discovering Business Models for Software Process Management - An Approach for Integrating Time and Resource Perspectives from Legacy Information Systems

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Multilingualism in Data Warehouse Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About