2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/indin.2011.6034984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software-intensive systems interoperability in Smart Grids: A semantic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fully exploiting the possibilities that this intelligence allows includes, for instance, advanced processing and reasoning on huge data streams (expressed in RDF triplets) as shown in [16,22]. Future works will aim to refine the distributed service discovery and determine the physical limits of the PGDIN's processing event streams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fully exploiting the possibilities that this intelligence allows includes, for instance, advanced processing and reasoning on huge data streams (expressed in RDF triplets) as shown in [16,22]. Future works will aim to refine the distributed service discovery and determine the physical limits of the PGDIN's processing event streams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major domain authorities (EPRI and IEC, the International Electro-technical Commission) have backed the development of a central smart grid standard, the so-called CIM (Common Information Model, [18]) and, then, defined its OWL model, laying the foundations for many research projects that have extended the CIM to include related electric protocols [19], combined the CIM ontology with other protocols' ontologies to achieve interoperability [20], etc. The EPRI has issued a number of recommendations to carry out this harmonisation, which could be implemented through OWL language assertions, once both data models are converted to its semantic form, thus also allowing us to perform automatic reasoning and inference processes [21][22][23].…”
Section: Power Network Nowadaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some authors consider the use of ontologies in context aware environments to be very sensitive to the size of the dataset and unreasonable to use for time-critical applications [8]. Similarly, in [3], the authors have reported a limitation in semantic processing, where the reasoner and rule engine would not be able to perform in realtime when applied to the full semantics model. We too are skeptical about the performance in scenarios of Smart City where the context data are of large size, constantly changing, and often incomplete.…”
Section: Information and Communications Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an ontology-based semantic model has become prevalent in the area of context aware and Smart City technologies [1,12,14]. Nonetheless, semantic processing is not capable of managing such vast amounts of data, as are expected in the Smart City scenario, in realtime [1,2,3,8]. Furthermore, in [10], the call for application of Big Data technology in Smart Grid analytics is emphasized and, as suggested in [11], cloud delivery of energy management solutions is largely becoming an accepted approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%