2017
DOI: 10.14393/bj-v33n4a2017-34738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software for automatic diagnostic prediction of skin clinical images based on ABCD rule

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Cancer is responsible for about 7 million annual deaths worldwide. Among them, the melanoma type, responsible for 4% of the skin cancers, whose incidence has doubled in the last ten years. The processing of digital images has shown good potential for assistance in the early detection of melanomas. In this sense, the objective of the current study was to develop a software for clinical images processing and reach a score of accuracy higher than 95%. The ABCD rule was used as a guide for the development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequent equipment resolution used in the articles was 320x240. A possible hypothesis for the number of studies using FLIR Systems could be its time in the market since FLIR is responsible for the first generation of infrared devices for military purposes after the World War II [13]. The second most used manufacturer brand was Agema, mentioned in 18 studies.…”
Section: University Of Portomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent equipment resolution used in the articles was 320x240. A possible hypothesis for the number of studies using FLIR Systems could be its time in the market since FLIR is responsible for the first generation of infrared devices for military purposes after the World War II [13]. The second most used manufacturer brand was Agema, mentioned in 18 studies.…”
Section: University Of Portomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the characteristics or features of a segmented ROI, skin diseases are classified or identified usually through conventional as well as machine learning techniques (Cheng, 2012;DermNet, 2020;Dermweb, 2010;Dos, 2008;ISIC, 1979;Oselame, 2017;Patil, 2015;Zaidan, 2010). However, most of the machine learning techniques outperform conventional counterparts.…”
Section: Disease Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%