2012
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software for automated MRI‐based quantification of abdominal fat and preliminary evaluation in morbidly obese patients

Abstract: Purpose: To present software for supervised automatic quantification of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT, SAT) and evaluates its performance in terms of reliability, interobserver variation, and processing time, since fully automatic segmentation of fat-fraction magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is fast but susceptible to anatomical variations and artifacts, particularly for advanced stages of obesity. Results: Average processing times per patient were 6, 6þ4, and 21 minutes for FAA, SAA, and MSA (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage body fat was measured by DEXA. In a subgroup (n = 52), abdominal visceral fat content was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as described previously (20). Insulin sensitivity was assessed with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp method as described previously (21).…”
Section: Cohort Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage body fat was measured by DEXA. In a subgroup (n = 52), abdominal visceral fat content was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as described previously (20). Insulin sensitivity was assessed with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp method as described previously (21).…”
Section: Cohort Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of gross body fat in separate compartments was originally very timeconsuming because of the need to manually segment the different compartments. More recently introduced semi-automated and automated segmentation techniques have made this process faster (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)and there is increasing evidence of good reliability and correlation with the laborious standard of manual segmentation (18). Variances of up to 1% for semiautomated segmentation of superficial fat, and 1-2% for intramuscular adipose tissue (19) have been reported and test-retest reliability appears to be excellent with a study of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in children using a fully automated process demonstrating correlation coefficients of r=0.977 for VAT and r=0.999 for subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) (20).…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A whole abdominal scan typically consists of 15 to 50 slices, imposing a substantial image-processing task when processed by a semi-automated segmentation method. Both manual and semiautomated methods require users’ interventions, which may cause inter- and intra-observer variations that undermine the data reliability (Thörmer et al, 2013). In order to circumvent the above disadvantages, user-independent and fully-automated MR image processing methods have been investigated (Thörmer et al, 2013; Kullberg et al, 2007; Zhou et al, 2011; Positano et al, 2004; Demerath et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%