1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9287(89)80047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software engineering techniques for computer-aided learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we address these two design dimensions by emphasizing in the language engineering principles used. In Sierra et al (2008aSierra et al ( , 2008b there are additional examples of applying this process into the context of a Socratic Tutoring System (Bork, 1985;Ibrahim, 1989).…”
Section: Language Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we address these two design dimensions by emphasizing in the language engineering principles used. In Sierra et al (2008aSierra et al ( , 2008b there are additional examples of applying this process into the context of a Socratic Tutoring System (Bork, 1985;Ibrahim, 1989).…”
Section: Language Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate our approach we will use a very simplified version of a Socratic Tutoring System, which is based on the works performed by Prof. Alfred Bork's team during the 1980s (Bork, 1985;Ibrahim, 1989). Although the pedagogical adequacy of tutoring systems as mechanisms for supporting sophisticated learning processes has been seriously questioned, today there is a very active community working in this field, as well as relevant initiatives (e.g.…”
Section: An Example Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that our graphical editor was meant to be used to build specification graphs from scratch during brainstorming sessions [9], we considered that having a complete rearrangement of the graph layout at each step of the editing would unacceptably disrupt the editing process. Even a sporadic rearrangement of nodes was rejected as unacceptable if it was not absolutely necessary.…”
Section: Comparison Of Graph-drawing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%