Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering 2000
DOI: 10.1145/336512.336584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
91
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation decisions using these methods tend to be driven by ways that are not connected to, and usually not optimal for value creation. Factors such as flexibility, time to market, cost and risk reduction often have higher impacts on value creation [Boehm and Sullivan, 2000]. Hence, flexibility is in the essence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation decisions using these methods tend to be driven by ways that are not connected to, and usually not optimal for value creation. Factors such as flexibility, time to market, cost and risk reduction often have higher impacts on value creation [Boehm and Sullivan, 2000]. Hence, flexibility is in the essence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980's Barry Boehm established a framework for an economics-oriented approach to software development focused on cost estimation [20,21]. These concepts have been extended in many directions, including the economic tradeoffs made during COTS product deployment [35].…”
Section: An Options Approach To Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For software businesses it was even mentioned that "value creation is the final arbiter of success […] In particular, there is a deeper understanding of the role of strategy in creating value" (Boehm and Sullivan, 2000).…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%