2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3144072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software-Defined Networking Meets Software-Defined Radio in Mobile ad hoc Networks: State of the Art and Future Directions

Abstract: The aims of this survey article are to elaborate on cross-layer optimization, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Software-Defined Radio (SDR) as separate domains of wireless network design for which a unified view has not been adequately considered to date and present lessons learned, with a view towards the challenges associated with SDN-SDR interaction that would facilitate benefits in crosslayer optimization of mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). We focus on MANETs because (i) they are still at the forefron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the controller exploits coding opportunities at dominant nodes to reduce transmission counts during communication in the network. Repeated packet encoding during transmissions through sensory nodes reduces packet delay which is demonstrated by Szab et al 24 In the literature, various applications of SDN‐enabled WSN are deployed in a range of environments and confirmed the improvement in different evaluation metrics 25–29 . Network coding is susceptible to security issues, even though opportunistic coding with SDN architecture is better suitable for futuristic networks, such as 5G 30,31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the controller exploits coding opportunities at dominant nodes to reduce transmission counts during communication in the network. Repeated packet encoding during transmissions through sensory nodes reduces packet delay which is demonstrated by Szab et al 24 In the literature, various applications of SDN‐enabled WSN are deployed in a range of environments and confirmed the improvement in different evaluation metrics 25–29 . Network coding is susceptible to security issues, even though opportunistic coding with SDN architecture is better suitable for futuristic networks, such as 5G 30,31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Repeated packet encoding during transmissions through sensory nodes reduces packet delay which is demonstrated by Szab et al 24 In the literature, various applications of SDN-enabled WSN are deployed in a range of environments and confirmed the improvement in different evaluation metrics. [25][26][27][28][29] Network coding is susceptible to security issues, even though opportunistic coding with SDN architecture is better suitable for futuristic networks, such as 5G. 30,31 The usage of SDN somehow addresses the security issues in the candidate wireless ad hoc networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liberato et al [22] proposed residuedefined networking architecture as a new approach for enabling key features like ultra-reliable and low-latency communication in Micro Datacenters networks. Kafetzis [23] et al introduced a bridge called SDR between centralized network control inherent in SDN and the distributed nature of MANETs. The SDR offers the add-on features of flexible and fast PHY and MAC layer adaptation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAC layer also has a "dynamic route neighbour discovery table." A "Broad Route Distributed Time slot Assignment" method is applied to the cross-layered sensor system after the route for packet F I G U R E 1 Architecture of sensor node [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%