2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Defined Networking for Next Generation Converged Metro-Access Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [8] proposed a meta-MAC algorithm for applying SDN principles to the optical access and mobile backhaul networks, which allow to coordinate the medium access control algorithms of different PON technology and physical layers. [9] presents a control plane architecture for SDN-driven converged metro-access networks. The SDN controller maintains communication with the network orchestrator, and exports an abstracted network view to the controllers.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Sdn Applied To Ponsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [8] proposed a meta-MAC algorithm for applying SDN principles to the optical access and mobile backhaul networks, which allow to coordinate the medium access control algorithms of different PON technology and physical layers. [9] presents a control plane architecture for SDN-driven converged metro-access networks. The SDN controller maintains communication with the network orchestrator, and exports an abstracted network view to the controllers.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Sdn Applied To Ponsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the network test-bed demonstrated in [27] the SDN controller architecture, implemented in Ryu, follows the open network foundation (ONF) architecture using three main interfaces: the application-controller plane interface (A-CPI) between the control plane and the application; the intermediate-controller plane interface (I-CPI) between the network orchestrator (NetO) and the access/core network controllers (NCs); and the device-controller plane interface (D-CPI) between the controllers and the physical devices [30]. The LR-PON protocol is a partial implementation of the XGPON standard, with the major differences being the longer distance and the higher split ratio supported.…”
Section: Multi-service Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13: an SDN-enabled fast protection mechanism and end-to-end service restoration in case of a primary link failure [31], [32]; and an SDN-enabled dynamic wavelength allocation (DWA) in response to an increased traffic demand [30]. In the fast protection use case the service restoration time is measured at the ONU when a failure event is caused by a cut in the backhaul link between the primary OLT and the AN [33].…”
Section: Multi-service Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BER is measured at the OLT in burst mode operation on 2s bursts generated by two different ONUs, with ODN path loss for the two ONUs adjusted to represent worst cast loud and soft adjacent bursts the most challenging situation for the burst-mode receiver, for more detail see [12]. The implemented SDN control plane implemented in Ryu, follows the open network foundation (ONF) architecture using three main interfaces: the application-controller plane interface (A-CPI) between the control plane and the application; the intermediate-controller plane interface (I-CPI) between the network orchestrator (NetO) and the access/core network controllers (NCs); and the device-controller plane interface (D-CPI) between the controllers and the physical devices [14].…”
Section: Multi-service Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%