2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software defect prediction using relational association rule mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It basically deals with finding rules that will predict the occurrence of item based on the occurrence of other items. [11,17,40,26] 3. Clustering: Clustering is a way to categorize a collection of items into groups or clusters whose members are similar in some way.…”
Section: Software Defect Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It basically deals with finding rules that will predict the occurrence of item based on the occurrence of other items. [11,17,40,26] 3. Clustering: Clustering is a way to categorize a collection of items into groups or clusters whose members are similar in some way.…”
Section: Software Defect Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After using the some data preprocessing methods such as oversampling, discretization and input selection, they applied AntMiner+ and then compared the performance of the model with the performances of the models which were built with C4.5, logistic regression and SVM. In the study of Czibula, Marian and Czibula; relational association rules mining which was a kind of classification method was used for defect prediction [14]. The irrelevant metrics were eliminated by preprocessing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial methods of prediction for software fault-proneness were built using statistics, though the prediction efficiency was insufficient of these methods. For this reason, most modern studies introduce the machine learning systems comprising data mining [4], SVMs [5], ANN [6], naive Bayes algorithm [7], and fuzzy logic, etc. While software faults were explored using these methods, yet there are numerous characteristics of faults continuing vague.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%