Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3307650.3322227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SoftSKU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing benchmarks that are generally used to design processors do not accurately represent the workloads at hyperscalars. As highlighted by several previous works [3,5,20,36,35], cloud workloads exhibit fundamentally different IPC, cache miss rates, and other metrics compared to standard benchmarks. These factors make the SPEC and other commercially available benchmarks a bad proxy for studying the performance of server processors in a datacenter.…”
Section: Code Memory Bw and Latency Challenges In Cloud Datacen-tersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Existing benchmarks that are generally used to design processors do not accurately represent the workloads at hyperscalars. As highlighted by several previous works [3,5,20,36,35], cloud workloads exhibit fundamentally different IPC, cache miss rates, and other metrics compared to standard benchmarks. These factors make the SPEC and other commercially available benchmarks a bad proxy for studying the performance of server processors in a datacenter.…”
Section: Code Memory Bw and Latency Challenges In Cloud Datacen-tersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SoftSKU [36] examines Meta's cloud workloads, understanding OS and hardware behavior using "Soft SKUs" by adjusting core/uncore frequencies, LLC prioritization, and active core counts. They observe similar IPC, cache, and TLB MPKIs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations