1994
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/266.4.917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft X-ray observations of the early B giants Formula and Formula CMa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps of more relevance is the fact that the same conclusion was reached for some late O-type dwarfs in the SMC having mass-loss rates comparable to what is anticipated for β Cephei stars (Ṁ down to 10 −9 -10 −10 M yr −1 ; Bouret et al 2003). A very weak wind was derived for the most evolved star in our sample, β CMa, from soft X-ray observations:Ṁ = 6 × 10 −9 M yr −1 (Drew et al 1994).…”
Section: Neglect Of Stellar Windssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Perhaps of more relevance is the fact that the same conclusion was reached for some late O-type dwarfs in the SMC having mass-loss rates comparable to what is anticipated for β Cephei stars (Ṁ down to 10 −9 -10 −10 M yr −1 ; Bouret et al 2003). A very weak wind was derived for the most evolved star in our sample, β CMa, from soft X-ray observations:Ṁ = 6 × 10 −9 M yr −1 (Drew et al 1994).…”
Section: Neglect Of Stellar Windssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…While this is likely to be valid for the wind of a star like ζ Pup (see e.g. discussion by Hillier et al 1993), the assumption will eventually become invalid as the density declines (Drew, Hoare & Denby 1994;Martins et al 2005b;Lucy 2012). Recently Huenemoerder et al (2012) showed that the X-ray emission from μ Columbae originated in the wind, and required a hot gas component with a mass-loss rate in excess of that inferred from analysis of UV lines.…”
Section: Line Force Momentum Equation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Importantly, these work ratios Q are calculated from models that include X‐ray emission in the ionization balance. Drew, Hoare & Denby (1994) highlighted the effect that X‐ray emission may have on the wind velocity and mass‐loss rate. They suggest that ionization by X‐rays may change the ionization structure in the inner part of the wind, thus reducing the total radiative acceleration and consequently the mass‐loss rate.…”
Section: Stellar Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%