PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 21 FEBRUARY 1972 7 D. W. Ross, unpublished calculation (cf. Ref. 3, Appendix C). The important point is that the resonant contribution to the growth or damping rate contains the average along a field line of $ cos(moJ b Idl/v H) which is small because of the oscillating cosine factor.The nature of the electronic state of transition metals and alloys remains a subject of discussion. 1 There are mainly two quite distinct approaches to this problem: The first is the rigidband model which makes no distinction between the different constituents of the alloy and attributes a common band to all electrons. The second is the virtual-bound-state model (preferred for dilute impurities) which assumes screening of the host electrons at the site of the impurity. Neither of these two limiting models can fully describe the actual situation. Though many experimental facts favor the virtual-bound-state model, its application is difficult in the case of concentrated alloys, especially when the magnetic electrons have much itinerant character as, for example, in CuNi alloys. 2 Soven 3 and Velicky, Kirkpatrick, and Ehrenreich 4 have therefore used the coherent-potential approximation (CPA) to describe the electronic properties of binary alloys. The results of these calculations are very promising, and invite comparison with experimental results.The CuNi system may be regarded as one of the test cases for theoretical descriptions of magnetic alloys. 5 This system had long been considered the prototype alloy whose magnetic properties are explained by the rigid-band model. Yet simple theoretical considerations 6 * 7 and much recent experimental evidence 5 ' 8 " 12 show the inadequacy of that model for the CuNi system. Ehrenreich and co-workers 4 ' 6t 7 * 13 find that an approach based on the CPA (which they call the minimum polarity model) does indeed account much more satisfactorily for the experimental observations. Recently Stocks, Williams, and Faulkner 14 have re-examined the CuNi problem using the CPA, Here, m is the closest integer to lq(r). The mode is not assumed to be of the form e im ® but instead slowly varying along the field line at each radius. 9 R. Z. Sagdeev and A. A. Galeev, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 180, 839 (1968) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 13, 562 (1968)].following the work of Kirkpatrick, Velicky, and Ehrenreich. 13 We report here x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) data for the density of states of NiCu alloys and compare them with the theoretical predictions and with other measurements. These include (1) the specific-heat measurements of Gupta, Cheng, and Beck, 8 which strongly favor a CPA description; (2) the very extensive uv-photoemission data of Seib and Spicer 9 ' 10 which were originally interpreted in terms of the virtual-bound-state model, but can indeed be very well interpreted 13 ' 14 in the CPA; and (3) the extensive x-ray-emission investigation of Clift, Curry, and Thompson, u who found that the sharing of electrons between Cu and Ni is small but were unable to determine the form ...