2023
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2022.3233909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Tissue Monitoring of the Surgical Field: Detection and Tracking of Breast Surface Deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to sources of error, the resolution of feature points in the stereo camera pair (Figure 5) relies on image processing methods to reliably extract features. This accuracy has been reported to be approximately 1.6mm on average [11]. In addition, point localization with the NDI tracked stylus is subject to approximately 1.0mm of localization error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to sources of error, the resolution of feature points in the stereo camera pair (Figure 5) relies on image processing methods to reliably extract features. This accuracy has been reported to be approximately 1.6mm on average [11]. In addition, point localization with the NDI tracked stylus is subject to approximately 1.0mm of localization error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Then, without adjusting or moving the cart setup, stereo camera images of the breast phantom were collected from each of the two Grasshopper cameras, and the fiducials on the breast phantom were digitized with the tracked NDI stylus. Using a custom MATLAB program, the fiducial coordinates from the stereo camera images were triangulated in stereo camera space [11]. The stereo camera points were then registered to NDI camera space using the calibration output data, and a TRE between the transformed stereo camera pair points and the collected NDI points was determined.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phantom shape was modeled after the Breast Probe Model for breast ultrasound training from Simulab (Simulab Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA). 26 red-ink fiducial markers were placed on the phantom surface to mimic skin fiducials that have been proposed for skin surface tracking in previous work 6 . These red-ink fiducials were placed on top of red glass beads so that they were visible in stereo camera imaging and CT imaging.…”
Section: Phantom Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, monitoring the surgical field to capture breast shape changes and then using that data to inform deformable registration algorithms could be a workflow-friendly means to establish image guidance for BCS. Previous work focused on a technique for achieving this by measuring the breast geometry with stereo camera monitoring and ink-based surface fiducials 6 . Inked fiducial points and alphabetic letters were written on the breast surface and matched with labeled points in an MR image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate the deformations that occur during BCS procedures due to retraction, a breast silicone phantom was developed. The phantom was constructed from 75% Ecoflex 00-10 platinum cure silicone rubber, 12.5% silicone rubber thinning fluid (Silicone Thinner), and 12.5% tactile mutator (Slacker) from Smooth-On, Inc. To quantify surface deformations, 26 1mm red glass beads were embedded on the phantom surface to simulate the typical sparse data acquisition achievable in previous studies 11 . In addition, 30 1-mm yellow glass beads were distributed throughout the subsurface phantom tissue.…”
Section: Phantom Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%