2013
DOI: 10.2319/100112-775.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue changes after mandibular setback and bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the relationship between soft tissue and bone structure for Class III patients before and after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery; to determine the impact of other factors on soft tissue change; and to evaluate correlations between thickness of tissue before surgery, SNA, SNB, and ANB angles, and soft tissue changes. Materials and Methods: The study included 78 Class III patients treated only with BSSO or with BSSO and Le Fort I osteotomy. Lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:364-77) A severe anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy in a pa-tientwithaClassIIImalocclusionisgenerallytreated with orthognathic surgery.However,a mild to moderate skeletal Class III malocclusion can be treated by either surgery or camouflage. 1,2 Traditionally, patients who were reluctant to undergo surgical procedures to improve their Class III dental relationships turned to camouflage orthodontic treatment with different extraction patterns according to the proclination of the mandibular incisors and the amount of negative overjet. [3][4][5] Recently, temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) have decreased the need for extractions and surgical procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:364-77) A severe anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy in a pa-tientwithaClassIIImalocclusionisgenerallytreated with orthognathic surgery.However,a mild to moderate skeletal Class III malocclusion can be treated by either surgery or camouflage. 1,2 Traditionally, patients who were reluctant to undergo surgical procedures to improve their Class III dental relationships turned to camouflage orthodontic treatment with different extraction patterns according to the proclination of the mandibular incisors and the amount of negative overjet. [3][4][5] Recently, temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) have decreased the need for extractions and surgical procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the studies of soft tissue cephalometric norms in Caucasian and Singaporean Chinese populations did not perform gender-stratified analysis [12,24], limiting a direct comparison with the current 3D Taiwanese Chinese data. The Bustone cephalometric method used in this study is a quantitative technique commonly employed for orthognathic surgical planning and outcome assessment [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, other methods exist which use 3D digital image-based measurements to enhance the arsenal of strategies and possibilities of clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1978, Burstone developed the "Cephalometrics for Orthognathic Surgery" [11,12]-a detailed analytical method which is widely accepted and used in the fields of orthodontics and orthognathic surgery [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. This two-dimensional (2D) image-based cephalometric method includes clinically useful facial bone (linear and angular measurements in horizontal and vertical directions) and soft-tissue (facial form and lip position) analysis [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many previous studies have focused on long-term skeletal and dental stability and soft tissue or airways changes after orthognathic surgery, a few ones have analyzed changes in in verbal and nonverbal facial movements 16,20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%