2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft SUSY breaking grand unification: Leptons vs quarks on the flavor playground

Abstract: We systematically analyze the correlations between the various leptonic and hadronic flavor violating processes arising in SUSY Grand Unified Theories. Using the GUT-symmetric relations between the soft SUSY breaking parameters, we assess the impact of hadronic and leptonic flavor observables on the SUSY sources of flavor violation. I. INTRODUCTIONSupersymmetry (SUSY) Breaking (SB) remains one of the biggest issues in physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). In spite of various proposals [1], we still miss a re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
151
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(68 reference statements)
8
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On top of that, if the Mu3e experiment reaches the expected precision finding no sign of the µ → eee process, the parameter space of the model will turn out to be significantly constrained. These results are in good agreement with those obtained with the mass insertion approximation (MIA) [14,15,16,17,18], which provides a simplified description of the phenomenology. As Table 2: Transformation of the matter and flavon superfields under the flavor symmetry G f = A 4 × Z 4 , for non trivial cases the correspondent daggered fields are also specified.…”
Section: A ∆(27) Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On top of that, if the Mu3e experiment reaches the expected precision finding no sign of the µ → eee process, the parameter space of the model will turn out to be significantly constrained. These results are in good agreement with those obtained with the mass insertion approximation (MIA) [14,15,16,17,18], which provides a simplified description of the phenomenology. As Table 2: Transformation of the matter and flavon superfields under the flavor symmetry G f = A 4 × Z 4 , for non trivial cases the correspondent daggered fields are also specified.…”
Section: A ∆(27) Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is because, in this model, the dominant effect comes from the LL mass insertion and, therefore, the two tan β -enhanced terms have the same sign. A detailed discussion of these effects can be found in [18]. We see that present and future LFV constraints are able to explore large values of m 0 and M 1/2 in these models, well beyond the LHC reach.…”
Section: An a 4 Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that we explicitly kept terms of order ǫ 1 . For the individual equations (23), (29) and (30) even the ǫ 2 contributions of these coefficients would be required. In the matching equation (32), they drop out, however.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases the bounds are much stronger than the ones derived from other measurements. Constraints within various supersymmetric extensions are analyzed in [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] (for overviews see [3,35]). Bounds on the Little Higgs Model with T-parity have also been presented [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%