2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft48309.2020.9116011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Robot Control With a Learned Differentiable Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their work uses sensitivity analysis to obtain gradients from the dynamic equations but conducts system identification through trial and error. Finally, [15] proposes to control a soft tendon with a learned differentiable model. Compared to our pipeline, [15] uses a neural network model and assumes the motion is quasi-static, while our pipeline removes the quasistatic assumption and leverages an analytic dynamic model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their work uses sensitivity analysis to obtain gradients from the dynamic equations but conducts system identification through trial and error. Finally, [15] proposes to control a soft tendon with a learned differentiable model. Compared to our pipeline, [15] uses a neural network model and assumes the motion is quasi-static, while our pipeline removes the quasistatic assumption and leverages an analytic dynamic model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our core idea is to embed a differentiable simulator into a pipeline that alternates between simulated and real experiments. With gradient information readily available from a differentiable simulator, previous papers have demonstrated promising results in various soft-robot applications, including system identification and controller design [11]- [15]. However, results from existing differentiable simulators are primarily focused on simulated robots, and demonstrations on real underwater soft robots have yet to be seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven machine learning methods may provide alternative solutions for the design and control of soft robots in the lack of existing analytical or numerical models that describe their underlying kinematics, dynamics, and functions (Chin et al, 2020). One common approach is to learn these models by gathering data from robot experiments and training a neural network (NN) architecture (Bern et al, 2020;Hyatt et al, 2019;Thuruthel et al, 2019). However, the need for data efficiency, i.e., the ability to learn from only a few experimental trials, presents a core challenge for such methods (Chatzilygeroudis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can think of a simulator as a highly complex function, taking forces at a discrete set of locations as input, returning a deformed configuration as output. There are two incentives to replace this function at least partially with a neural network: (1) to augment the simulation model where the sim-to-real gap is high and more accurate models are unknown (e.g., for frictional contact [26]), and (2) to reduce the time complexity of simulations to either speed up simulation-driven design and control [27, 28 •], or to enable the interactive exploration of soft robot designs [29 •]. There is also work on completely replacing a simulator with a neural network [30], learned from either real or simulated data. While providing an exciting avenue for future research, a complete replacement of the simulator comes at the cost of longer training and requiring more data.…”
Section: Differentiable Simulation and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%