2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cds.2017.0347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft input decoder for high‐rate generalised concatenated codes

Abstract: Generalised concatenated (GC) codes are well suited for error correction in flash memories for high-reliability data storage. The GC codes are constructed from inner extended binary Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes and outer Reed-Solomon codes. The extended BCH codes enable high-rate GC codes and low-complexity soft input decoding. This work proposes a decoder architecture for high-rate GC codes. For such codes, outer error and erasure decoding are mandatory. A pipelined decoder architecture is proposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduces the overall decoding complexity significantly because the BMA typically dominates the computational complexity. Consider for instance the RS decoder architectures for error and erasure decoding reported in [30,31]. In [30], the BMA requires 84% of the total logic of the decoder for an RS code of length n = 508, whereas the syndrome calculation and the Forney algorithm need only 11%.…”
Section: Erasure Only Decoding Of Rs Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reduces the overall decoding complexity significantly because the BMA typically dominates the computational complexity. Consider for instance the RS decoder architectures for error and erasure decoding reported in [30,31]. In [30], the BMA requires 84% of the total logic of the decoder for an RS code of length n = 508, whereas the syndrome calculation and the Forney algorithm need only 11%.…”
Section: Erasure Only Decoding Of Rs Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], the BMA requires 84% of the total logic of the decoder for an RS code of length n = 508, whereas the syndrome calculation and the Forney algorithm need only 11%. Similarly, in [31] a decoder for RS codes of length n = 334 is considered. The BMA occupies 51%, the syndrome calculation 14%, and the Forney algorithm 14% of the area for logic, respectively.…”
Section: Erasure Only Decoding Of Rs Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positions altered by the bit-flipping patterns can be determined by sorting the soft-values, but the positions altered by the algebraic decoder are only known after each algebraic decoding step. Hence, all LLR values are stored in [13]. In order to reduce the RAM requirements, we store only the positions and the LLR values corresponding to the least reliable values, where we increase the search depth for the LLR values.…”
Section: Gc Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, GC codes use components codes where the outer RS codes have a larger alphabet size than the inner BCH codes. With such constructions the decoder complexity is dominated by the logic for the RS decoder [18, 27]. Using stronger inner codes reduces the decoder complexity for the outer codes.…”
Section: Gc Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction enables high‐rate GC codes. Moreover, these GC codes have a low complexity compared to long BCH codes and are well suited for fast hardware decoding architectures [18, 27]. However, with soft‐input decoding the inner SPC limits the coding gain [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%