Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: A randomized prevention trial

Shuster, J J; Jenkins, Alan D.; Logan, C. J. H.; Barnett, Todd; Riehle, Robert A.; Zackson, D.A.; Wolfe, Honor M.; Dale, Rita; Daley, M.; Malik, Iqbal; Schnarch, S.

doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90074-w

Cited by 106 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In healthy subjects, cola has been found to significantly increase urinary oxalate excretion in both sexes (Rodgers, 1999), and the consumption of beer resulted in a reduction of urinary pH and an increase in urinary uric acid excretion (Hesse et al, 1993). In a randomized controlled trial in male stone patients, Shuster et al (1992) were able to demonstrate a strong association between the amount of soft drink consumption (acidified with phosphoric acid) and the recurrence of urinary stone formation in the course of a 3-year follow-up (Shuster et al, 1992, CE Ib).…”

Section: Types Of Beveragesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fluid intake and epidemiology of urolithiasis

Siener

Hesse

2003

Eur J Clin Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A low urine volume is an important risk factor in urinary stone formation. The present article summarizes available data from epidemiological and clinical studies to elucidate the impact of fluid intake and urine volume on the risk of urinary stone formation and the prevention of stone recurrence. A review of the literature shows that an increased urine volume achieved by a high fluid intake exerts an efficacious preventive effect on the onset and recurrence of urinary stones. A high water intake and urine dilution results in a marked reduction in saturation of lithogenous salts. The type of fluids should be carefully selected to achieve the appropriate change of urine composition depending on stone composition. A sufficient intake of fluid is one of the most important preventive measures for stone recurrence.

show abstract

Section: Types Of Beveragesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fluid intake and epidemiology of urolithiasis

Siener

Hesse

2003

Eur J Clin Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several small studies have investigated the effect of soda on urinary composition in healthy volunteers with inconsistent results (11)(12)(13)(14). Relatively small cross-sectional (5) and case-control (6) studies as well as a randomized controlled study (7) suggested an association between soda and history (5,6) or recurrence (7) of kidney stones without further exploring the specific beverage (e.g., cola or sugar-sweetened sodas versus artificially sweetened versions). This issue may be important, because sugar-sweetened beverages contain fructose, which has been found to be associated with kidney stones (15) as well as known risk factors for kidney stones, such as gout (16,17) and obesity (18).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soda and Other Beverages and the Risk of Kidney Stones

Ferraro

Taylor

Gambaro

et al. 2013

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

212

175

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryBackground and objectives Not all fluids may be equally beneficial for reducing the risk of kidney stones. In particular, it is not clear whether sugar and artificially sweetened soda increase the risk.Design, setting, participants, & measurements We prospectively analyzed the association between intake of several types of beverages and incidence of kidney stones in three large ongoing cohort studies. Information on consumption of beverages and development of kidney stones was collected by validated questionnaires.Results The analysis involved 194,095 participants; over a median follow-up of more than 8 years, 4462 incident cases occurred. There was a 23% higher risk of developing kidney stones in the highest category of consumption of sugar-sweetened cola compared with the lowest category (P for trend=0.02) and a 33% higher risk of developing kidney stones for sugar-sweetened noncola (P for trend=0.003); there was a marginally significant higher risk of developing kidney stones for artificially sweetened noncola (P for trend=0.05). Also, there was an 18% higher risk for punch (P for trend=0.04) and lower risks of 26% for caffeinated coffee (P for trend,0.001), 16% for decaffeinated coffee (P for trend=0.01), 11% for tea (P for trend=0.02), 31%-33% for wine (P for trend,0.005), 41% for beer (P for trend,0.001), and 12% for orange juice (P for trend=0.004).Conclusions Consumption of sugar-sweetened soda and punch is associated with a higher risk of stone formation, whereas consumption of coffee, tea, beer, wine, and orange juice is associated with a lower risk.

show abstract

“…86 Also, 5 studies reported that soft drink consumption was positively associated with urinary or kidney stones, but 2 studies reported no association (average r = 0.05). 76,77,[92][93][94][95][96] Two of the 5 studies that found positive associations 76,77 revealed that the effect of soft drink intake was no longer significant after other risk factors such as calcium, potassium, and sucrose intake had been controlled, suggesting that the effect of soft drink consumption on urinary stones may be a consequence of its influence on these other risk factors. A 10-week experimental study showed that individuals who consumed sucrosesweetened beverages exhibited an increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study, whereas individuals who consumed artificially sweetened beverages exhibited a decrease in blood pressure.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Soft Drink Consumption on Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a meta-analysis of 88 studies, we examined the association between soft drink consumption and nutrition and health outcomes. We found clear associations of soft drink intake with increased energy intake and body weight. Soft drink intake also was associated with lower intakes of milk, calcium, and other nutrients and with an increased risk of several medical problems (e.g., diabetes).Study design significantly influenced results: larger effect sizes were observed in studies with stronger methods (longitudinal and experimental vs cross-sectional studies). Several other factors also moderated effect sizes (e.g., gender, age, beverage type). Finally, studies funded by the food industry reported significantly smaller effects than did non-industry-funded studies. Recommendations to reduce population soft drink consumption are strongly supported by the available science. (Am J Public Health.

show abstract

Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: A randomized prevention trial

Cited by 106 publications

References 8 publications

Fluid intake and epidemiology of urolithiasis

Fluid intake and epidemiology of urolithiasis

Soda and Other Beverages and the Risk of Kidney Stones

Effects of Soft Drink Consumption on Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About