1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1986.tb00494.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOFT DOLLARS AND SECTIN 28(e) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: A 1985 PERSPECTIVE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seen in this light, Logue's (1991) assertion that soft dollar research does not pass a cost-benefit test is suspect. Burgunder and Hartmann's (1986) assertion that in the absence of Section 28(e) protection managers would continue purchasing research "until the last hard dollar spent for the research equaled the value of that research to the clients" is simply wrong. So, too, is the conclusion that soft dollars necessarily lead managers to purchase too much research.…”
Section: ©2000 the Research Foundation Of Aimrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seen in this light, Logue's (1991) assertion that soft dollar research does not pass a cost-benefit test is suspect. Burgunder and Hartmann's (1986) assertion that in the absence of Section 28(e) protection managers would continue purchasing research "until the last hard dollar spent for the research equaled the value of that research to the clients" is simply wrong. So, too, is the conclusion that soft dollars necessarily lead managers to purchase too much research.…”
Section: ©2000 the Research Foundation Of Aimrmentioning
confidence: 99%